Jump to content

BRFCS

BY THE FANS, FOR THE FANS, SINCE 1996
Proudly partnered with TheTerraceStore.com

Hoochie Bloochie Mama

Members
  • Posts

    5795
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    70

Everything posted by Hoochie Bloochie Mama

  1. Exactly mate, the balance is all wrong. The defence is essentially exposed for 90 mins, no cover in front and no cover on the flanks. It's a choice Mowbray has made so he can press high up the pitch. I see Warnock is 7 unbeaten. He just sets his teams up to be solid and it brings success. He's a pragmatist. It going to be an eventful season, but I don't think it will end in success unless Mowbray changes tack.
  2. SWFC points deduction aside we've beaten the bottom 3.
  3. Any defender will look shit under Mowbray.
  4. *Manager stands up* "Lads, it's Blackburn. They can't defend" *Manager sits down*
  5. "But at least we've still got Wycombe to play away!" "Oh I wish we could play Coventry every day!" "Let's hope Tony's out by Christmas!"
  6. We could have AC Milan's defence of the 90's and still concede a hatful. As was said pre-season, there's more to our shite defending than personnel. Risk & reward the manager said this week - he accepts we sacrifice defence for the high-press and leaving our defence exposed. It's all on him, not the players.
  7. BB's position according to Mowbray. Naturally he sticks him at fullback.
  8. We'd be able to defend if Rothwell was playing?
  9. If we've got a Top 2 squad then we must have a League 2 manager.
  10. Like I said, 4 home games, 1 win, and we can't defend and never have been able to under Mowbray.
  11. 4 home games. 1 win against the mighty Wycombe. Out of sorts?
  12. We're winning the possession stats if that helps?.
  13. Over 3 years of Mowbray. We still can't defend. You can have all the Elliot's and Dolan's in the world but if you can't do the basics you'll never go anywhere.
  14. It doesn't tell you anything.
  15. I was referring to them both. And 'media whore' has nothing to do how anybody looks, or even gender-specific, it's a reference to people whoring themselves out to the media for money. Mine post was just a throwaway comment in response to your 'sweet kids in love' stuff. And if i could I'd be whoring myself out to the media?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.