Jump to content

BRFCS

BY THE FANS, FOR THE FANS, SINCE 1996
Proudly partnered with TheTerraceStore.com

Emerald Isle Rover

Members
  • Posts

    1493
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Everything posted by Emerald Isle Rover

  1. No way we’re paying 2/3million up front but I don’t see the problem in not if we get the player in. If they don’t play prem/champ ever that automatically means they are unproven he’s an international (albeit lesser country) with Europa league and conference league experience and going by interest from other clubs he would be a solid option
  2. No that wasn’t the point at all that’s a separate issue entirely I agree about failed windows and letting players contracts run down etc but to say attacking wise we didn’t resolve that but yet had a better season as Iv stated was/is irrelevant
  3. Yes it was generally settled 10 of the starting 11 were the same for those last 6 games
  4. There was approx 130 less goals this season than last over the division the top two scorers last season was 27 / 21 this season 19/18 if people want to argue pure black and white we scored 7 less then fine as statistically that is correct but today we didn’t fill that void is wrong - we filled it in other ways other players increasing their goal tally or their assist tally. Defensively improved massively taking the heat off the players up top arguing this point to me is silly because when you do significantly better for me it’s irrelevant
  5. Or we could have beat teams heavier than what we did and still got on the same points….its irrelevant the facts are we did better
  6. Yes the same batth that the majority of folk on here this time last year slated and didn’t want…we can’t predict what’s going to happen many many fans thought once Sammie left we were doomed but we weren’t that’s the point we filled the void in different ways….its still filling the void
  7. We did 7 goals over the course of a season isn’t much. Was a way bigger spread across the team as opposed to Sammie pretty much alone. Would we want it to be better? Of course who wouldn’t but the team became more balanced hence the higher position and more points
  8. And yet we finished 12 places higher and 13 points more….
  9. Allegedly…these reports aren’t fro verified sources so I’d 100% take them with a pinch of salt. jackson reported today in his update regarding left sided centre back and was no mention of this lad whatsoever
  10. Agree with most but I don’t think Val is a yes man
  11. Once again though you said this last year probably around the exact same time I do think we are behind in terms of recruitment and I’m not a big fan of people saying judge us when the window is closed etc but we are extremely early in it and there are very little clubs doing business at present
  12. Can’t see Coventry interest being real they are well stocked in that area unless they are selling sheaf
  13. Interesting….i don’t mind a film clear out if val wants his own men in so be it
  14. Can someone elaborate on the rumours about Lowe being an inside man? Never heard these before but now 3/4 comments on here and on x first Iv read/heard of it
  15. Obviously a lot of guesswork goes into how a season might pan out before it starts if we keep Travis / tronstad / Brittain and add couple more we should have more than enough to be top half again If we lose one or more from that lot then I guess it’s dependant on if they are replaced sufficiently or not but it’s literally the unknown nobody would have predicted that Luton would have been relegated given the squad they had and I see a lot bigging up both Birmingham and Wrexham - personally not sold on Wrexham yet but brum should be decent enough but to reiterate other posters - the contract situation is very alarming and it needs addressed one way or another so we have clarity going forward
  16. Chaddy is way way to positive about rovers and the obvious failings on show still don’t deter him. However on this occasion he was specific and stated he wouldn’t offer batth a 2 year deal would happily have him back for one plus an option so it was more a case of length of contract as opposed to their age
  17. Whilst I agree id still take the stance on if Iv been wrong about players before, I wouldn’t necessarily continue to make the same judgement but that’s me of course and yes my post was specifically aimed at mercer
  18. The argument is applied when there’s a consistent pattern….mercer has the consistent pattern
  19. But you said last summer (before playing for us) that batth and weimann were desperation signings and on the back of them signing would take a miracle for us to stay up. Now you’ve went full circle and are in uproar these lads are leaving and doing what you did last season not giving any of the new lads a chance yet
  20. Said the same yesterday and was shot down saying why would they risk their loyalty bonus payments - if the 10k cap is true they all should just ask for a transfer
  21. Two of those leaving you said last summer were utter desperation signings….not sure why your so much in uproar now
  22. Rangers money problems started in 03 he was there from 01 and promoted in 05 and left when the sh!t hit the fan. He then tried to sue rangers a case in which he dropped a year later. He was complicit and aware of the dodgy goings on at rangers given the timeframe he was there as for the Sunderland role I see some saying it’s not his fault the owners didn’t want to part with money….does that remind you of any owners bottom line is this man has a chequered history and not the sort of image/controversial character we need at this already breaking point time
  23. Won’t have that issue here with the 10k cap so we can rule that scenario out
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.