All good questions, which all could have been asked at the WATR AGM. And still no head of technical. At least GB and JDT held the club to account. The impression I got from Gestede was that he wasn’t going to do that. I wouldn’t be surprised if the budgets that Pasha went to India to agree a week or so ago are still not agreed.

I think Jackson said Fleck has joined pre-season to prove his fitness, but that Fadz hasn’t cos no contract agreement as yet.

Who mentioned contracts? Annihilated. Fed a length. You use weirdly aggressive language 🤣

It’s funny, but the other person who accused me of making it up conceded I wasn’t when they read what the club had said. So, I’d suggest it’s you who needs to learn to read. The annihilated part is funny though. Thanks for the laugh.

I’m sure Football Insider is a dingle! We’ve lost out on about 12 players already this summer according to that account.

You are doing God’s work, sir.

We’ll know soon enough, wasn’t Pasha on the plane to discuss budgets with them a couple of weeks ago? It amazes me the funding question wasn’t asked at the WATR AGM when they had the manager and head of football sat in front on them. Absolutely baffling!

That’s to be read as ‘while we wait for the August court case on matters unrelated to Rovers, venkys have filed a ‘present application’ to fund Rovers. The outcome of that application, according to Rovers, is that they can fund Rovers without impediment.

It’s in the post above the one you quoted

Venkys will blow their owners out of the water with their wage offer!

They said it.

I though Rudy ‘head of comms’ Gestede refusing to answer a question about transfers/budgets was quite telling!

Yeah, possibly.

Which is?

They’ve said there are no impediments to funding the club in the way they’ve done prior to last summer. That doesn’t mean they will.

And for the record, I don’t necessarily believe what they are saying is the whole picture. My issue is a few people on here who continually try to claim as fact that Venky’s ability to fund us hinges on the outcome of a court date in August. It doesn’t, according to the club. We’ll see what transpires.

Did anyone from WATR ask about transfer budgets or the funding issue being resolved? That’s the biggest issue facing the club and has been for the last 12 months.

Yeah I think it’s scandalous that fans are essentially only getting 1 pay day in which to take advantage the early bird. But it’s very Waggott.

That’s exactly what they said. I suggest you do some research before falsely accusing me of falsely accusing others of fake news👍

Sleepy Joe made me chuckle 👍

Based on numbers sold so far I’d be surprised if we don’t sell 10k, especially if we show a bit of ambition in the transfer market over the next couple of months. Imagine the Rovers twitter feed if we do hit 10k😉

You think we’ll only sell about 800 more STs before end of August?

All these points were addressed in the live feed of the AGM, that is linked higher up in this thread. As for your last paragraph, I think it’s a bit ignorant. Again, if you watch the recording of the event, discussions were had by fan groups and Waggott that led to the reduced ST prices this season, and @Miller11 made the point at how pleasantly surprised he was at just how much the YP prices were reduced by. So, yes, some people are making a difference.

Fake news. The court hearing, according to the club, relates to technical issues that have nothing to do with their ability to fund Rovers.

What an insightful comment. Thanks for sharing.