Jump to content

BRFCS

BY THE FANS, FOR THE FANS, SINCE 1996
Proudly partnered with TheTerraceStore.com

Tom

Backroom
  • Posts

    29204
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    73

Posts posted by Tom

  1. The article in the Telegraph is concerning, mention that we want to add at least 2 attacking players. Truth is we need 4!

    A lot of focus on loans when Tony was on record saying he didn’t want that.

    Really concerning, we could start the season with Conway in line for a starting spot which would be disastrous really.

    • Like 4
  2. Just now, AdamRochina said:

    Wow nothing to get excited about lol really said that? Wonder how the player linked would feel

    I presume it’s in the face of people asking if it’s a big money move for Maddison, a loan wouldn’t be as exciting. Or a link to a deal rather than an actual signing.

    Chapman more likely not to be coming back as well he says.

    Feel we all need a bit of good news soon!

  3. Just now, TruRover said:

    Why Maddison? 23 assists and 11 goals last season ( or something like that) which is more goal contributions than dack.  He also spent a couple of months injured at the end I think. Are u really telling me u would prefer Kent or loan to signing Maddison? I think singing 2 out and out wingers is more important than signing two strikers. Fair enough Kent probably  has potential to do well, but young loan players always take a while to get going and his Bristol city reviews which are from his most recent performances are not so encouraging. I would be very dissapoionted if we only signed Armstrong permanently with two loan signings. 

    But Nixon hasn’t linked us to Maddison! 

    • Like 5
  4. Just now, S8 & Blue said:

    Honestly - I think it looks fantastic. Striking, different, modern & stylish. You'll get used to it!

    Oh I like it - just wish the numbers were same colour as sponsor, navy for both ideally

    Have a feeling the away kit will tie in the sponsor nicely , it’s never easy on halved shirts but this one goes better than most 

    • Like 2
  5. Just now, rog of the rovers said:

    Looks nicer in the official shots.

    Interesting to see it in the flesh.

    Blue looks too light...

    DiX_OUEX0AA2Yzs.jpg

    DiX_Pa2X4AAqG5W.jpg

    DiX_Pa2X4AE_EGi.jpg

    DiX_Sj6X0AAPC0a.jpg

    My main issue with this is that there are navy elements but the sponsor is black, would look much better in navy.

     

    Odd thing is the logo for the company is navy on their twitter profile pick so black isn’t something they are known for 

    Mowbray and Waggott May miss Coventry a bit!

    Overall I like it for a change though 

  6. 18 minutes ago, Bigdoggsteel said:

    What has been said about his attitude? I didn't hear that from friends that support Liverpool. 

    I don't think it's as much of a risk as you say. It's a loan at the end of the day. I agree that we need to sign a winger also though 

    It’s a risk if we bring him instead of alternatives and he doesn’t perform 

    • Like 1
  7. Think I’d rather have Chapman on a permanent than Clark Kent on loan if it’s an either or thing. Bristol fans seemed unsure about him.

    When I say unsure if you search twitter they are pretty unanimous in their opinion if him - and it isn’t good.

    Lets hope he’s improved!

    edit - more worryingly it sounds like Bristol were fined by Liverpool for not playing him enough, a nice read about him here on a Bristol forum 

     

    https://www.otib.co.uk/index.php?/topic/194456-ryan-kent/

     

     

    • Like 2
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.