wilsdenrover

These sort of tackles?

Here’s some good info about Matt Woods: https://toffeeweb.com/season/14-15/comment/history/28493.html

I hope the release clause would be worded better that! 😁

Particularly when the ‘doom and gloom’ is based on 5 points from 24

Will you be watching Mission to Burnley?

I think the difference between these two phrases can be explained by the fact english is JDT’s second language.

Mansfield is the only other option

It’s obvious really:

Because…

I hope he’s inserted a release clause 😀

You can argue it is now, I don’t think you can argue it was at that time.

Possibly, was he a forward too? 😀

Bless you

Don’t tell Chaddy that he played for Burnley before us 😁

Because the price is right

I agree it’s subjective, but what leads you to thinking the price is a bargain?

Thanks, it doesn’t sound like that ‘warped’ the figures at all then.

Did either match have an unusually large away attendance?

Rage Against The Machine - Killing In The Name

I bet you enjoyed Minority Report 😁

I think the ‘theory is’ to stop people choosing to watch a higher division game on tv over attending a local ‘lesser’ game in person. Whether that has ever worked, or is still applicable for ‘modern’ football - I’ve no idea.

The Farm - All Together Now

I presume any requirement would come under the conditions of the grounds safety certificate - probably under ‘communications and control’

There isn’t, they just need to be cheaper…

As per my earlier post, they’ve only ‘protected’ 3pm Saturday because the offers weren’t good enough not to: In the EFLs own words: Research suggests removal of Article 48 (and the broadcast of all games) could lead to a drop of up to £37m in attendance revenue, therefore that number needed to be factored into any offer that sought to remove it