Jump to content

wilsdenrover

Members
  • Posts

    8327
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    55

Everything posted by wilsdenrover

  1. Does seem like a well known member!…
  2. I’m becoming seriously tempted to make a trip to Ewood
  3. Squeeze - Up The Junction Great lyrics
  4. I know, I feel like a right plank
  5. Offering yourself around all over the place today 😁
  6. You’re not on the fence with this one…
  7. Bias is as good a deciding factor as any 😀
  8. and a competent senior management team
  9. I’d rather not but thanks for the offer…
  10. Did this coincide with the upturn in form? Whatever else you do, don’t put it back on for the rest of the season!
  11. I think you’re right - they might have a good winge for a while longer though… Hopefully it doesn’t set back his career.
  12. Brentford = Moneyball Rovers = Balls To The Money
  13. The loan agreement (a contract) was finalised, the agreed timeline in the judgment confirms it was fully executed. As I’ve just said above, whether our failings constitute a breach of this contract will depend on the wording of any ‘subject to’ clause in either the agreement or the regulations. (As far as I’m aware) none of us has seen this so none of us can be certain as to whether or not there’s basis for a claim ( loan losses only)
  14. On the £20 Million loss. Surely to negate any claim, if promoted we just offer Forest the same fee - they can’t both reject it and sue for it at the same time. If Forest accept, but O’Brien rejects, and takes a lower wage elsewhere, he can’t sue for something he has turned down. Of course if we’re not promoted then the option wouldn’t have been triggered so no losses have been occurred I guess they could argue that we would have been promoted if he had signed - I can’t see that being a winnable case. Regarding claims on the loan period - I think this hinges on whether the loan agreement, or the regulations, have a clause along the lines of ‘subject to registration with the EFL’
  15. I agree with that but how on earth did George Hirst end up in that pond…
  16. Technotronic - Pump Up The Jam
  17. Dr Hook - When You’re In Love With A Beautiful Woman
  18. I guess in its simplest form: Any breach of contract hinges on whether such a clause was in the loan agreement If it was, and the contract is null and void, Forest/O’Brien would have to prove this was caused by negligence (and not ‘mere’ incompetence)
  19. Fats Domino - Ain’t That A Shame
  20. I guess the point I was trying to make was that some of the players are the same but their ‘ability to contribute’ (perceived or actual) has increased. By the way, I agree that the squad JDT inherited was stronger than the one TM inherited. I suppose the frustration is it could have been even stronger - but maybe we’d always feel that way
  21. I guess you can add the emergence of Carter and the resurgence of JRC. Possibly also the confidence that A Wharton and Garrett are good enough for this level.
×
×
  • Create New...