To your first point, yes it is a new version. point two. The games are played in sanitised conditions with cleared players and anyone who will come in to contact with them. point three, any step back to normalcy is a priority

but it is. A shop assistant or barber, to take your examples, will during the plying of their trade come into contact with more people who are likely to pass on or contract the virus than professional footballers.

Because they are less likely to infect someone else

To tell you the truth, I would prefer no musical intro, and for our players to come out looking like professional players who mean business, rather than show ponies.

I hope it’s Vinjay

Hopefully on that day we will be above them in the league

I don’t know one that’s open

I hope it’s not by the same scout that watched Brereton

As a large percentage of our attendance is made up of season-ticket holders, I would stick to my original suggestion.

If I was selling the first game back, it would be free to this seasons, season-ticket holders, and a fiver for walk-ons. Money will be tight, and habits will have changed. Prices should be tempting to get people back to Ewood.

It might be lucky for us that we have already had practice of going through that collapse

Which other leagues?

The tests just say if you have got it or not. Which in turn indicates if you are likely to infect someone else. They don’t make the individual any safer.

Tests don’t make you any safer.

If the last item is taken up, it will show that the decision makers have never played football at any level

I now have a stream. From what I have seen there is not much pressing or tackling going on

I can’t get a stream, what is the game like?

The company Rovers have flown with in the past are still operating, with aircraft that are carrying up to 40 passengers within social distancing rules.

Fine, they are looking after their own interests. It is better than head in the sand leadership.

They have shown leadership and made a decision. Whether it’s a good one,we will have to wait and see.

Because they think it isn’t going to be safe for a long time

Personally I will not be taking a vaccine for something that might have no physical effect on me, until at least one year of trials for side-effects have been carried out. Remember Thalidomide.

If there is a vaccine available in September, it hasn’t been tested properly.

Rather than have that document, I would have one that says you are welcome to not play, but you will be put on furlough.

I remember bad ones at Whitebirk