Who's the one getting personal? You simply can't accept that anyone could possibly have a different opinion than you on a player.

It's absolutely true, hindsight and his recent performances on the pitch have shown you've been wrong in your unstinting support of Neill but you won't admit that's the case.

As with Dunn/Ferguson you're contradicting your normal position again Gordon. You're usually one for the club taking preemptive strike action first, leaving the awkward player with nowhere to go!

If, as seems increasingly likely, we are getting Warnock in first it seems very unlikely we'll be keeping Lucas. And rightly so. He's been poor enough over the last couple of months as it is as his attention has wandered. It would be a disaster playing him for the remainder of the season imo.

Alan Brazil claimed on Talksport this morning that he had had an inside whisper that Lucash was in fact being offered much nearer 70k p.w. than the 50k previously quoted. This predictably prompted Adrian Durham to go off on one on his late afternoon slot "Is this the day football died for you when average cloggers like Lucas Neill can earn 50 - 70kp.w?" (Prat though he is, he does have a point) Reaction from West Ham fans who phoned in was mixed. One or two thought they were in deep bother and had to do something and Neill was a decent enough Premiership player, one or two thought the wages for a player of that calibre were ridiculous and would simply be passed onto the fans in the form of higher ticket prices. One guy professing to be a Blackburn fan called in and spoke sensibly about Lucash's versatility being able to play anywhere in the back four, but he wasn't worth that sort of money. However he then went on to say how we had a lot of young lads coming up in defence and unless my ears deceived me, he referred to Gray as a young lad which made me think he either didn't attend any games or was a "plant." Wish they'd bloody well hurry up and tie the deal up so we have time to sign his replacement.

Presumably because WHam are getting extremely deperate. No-one seems to want to join them in their current predicament. Amongst others SWP seemingly turned down a 9.6m move and even Ashley Young decided he'd rather definitely go down with Watford than possibly down with WHam. (Although he probably thinks he's got a move sorted to a team definitely not going down)

It's a no brainer, Tugay is nearly 37. They will be able to share the playmaking duties for now and Hughes will be able to cherry pick Tugs appearances much more selectively as he advances further into the Autumn of his career. BTW we haven't even made a decision on a new contract for Tugs yet have we? I certainly think he's done enough to earn another twelve months and hopefully we won't need to flog him to death week in week out. Also if anyone said now that the priority was competent cover for Savage (i.e. anyone but The Axe) I'd be in full agreement.

Le Saux and Sutton didn't force us in to a position where we didn't get a proper fee for them though.

As a dog lover that's good news as well!

1.25m is a lot better than I thought we'd do at this stage and if they think he's worth 50kp.w. good luck to them and him.

Quite right Eddie, we should now withdraw our latest contract offer and replace it with the lower one he was originally offered before the World Cup! Oh dear, it's all going pear shaped for Lucas isn't it? A place in Liverpool's reserves on not as much money as he thought or a bit more money than he's on here to drop down to the first division and scrap it out with the mighty Clarets! Where are Barcelona and AC Milan when you need them? Oh well, he always said he wanted a "challenge" Trying to keep West Ham up certainly falls into that category.

Great point. Absolutely delighted with this, the lad is still only 27 and if he stays fit should be coming to his peak. This could be the best signing we've secured in a very long while imo. Given a reasonable run fitness wise we've landed a 7m quality midfielder for a million upfront!. No disrespect to MGP but the next project ought to be to relieve Spuds of 10m for him and rescue Duffer from his barcodes misery for around half the price. P.S. Good job me and den finally managed to jolt the Board into action late last night!

No he doesn't! It leaves him with the possibility of having to sit out the last 6 months of his contract at Bolton, with no guarantee whatsoever that either we or any other Premiership club will still be interested come the summer. Incidentally interesting to see you are encouraging such behaviour from Dunn. You were absolutely appalled that Ferguson could possibly indulge in such skullduggery!

Why is that Bruce being a ****? It's simply us wasting everyone's time and effort including our own.

Yep, just to repeat what I put on the transfer rumour thread the LT "understands" that Bolton have agreed to pay an initial 750k up front for Dunn with a further 250 k due in August if Birmingham achieve promotion back to the Premiership. (Eh?) They have also agreed to pay a further 1m once he makes 50 Premiership appearances for them. Rovers will have to match these terms to get permission to speak to Dunn. The criteria for the payment of the 250 k can't be right can it? however I suspect the overall figures are right. It seems from Rovers point of view the situation couldn't be simpler, it's a case of put up or shut up. There's absolutely no point fannying around with another bid lower than the one Bolton have put in. --------------------

Couldn't agree more Den, it's one million plus add ons IF he does well we're talking about, not five or ten mill. If he passes the medical can't see the problem at all. What's the alternative, wait until Jan 30th and realise we can't get him until July, leaving us with Savage (tottering on the brink of suspension) and Tugay (37 ish) for the rest of the season?

So, even by your criteria Derbyshire still has another couple of years to make it into a 30 Premiership goal a season striker. In terms of Rovers strikers I can only think back to Beattie's debut when he was fed to the lions (i.e. Bould and Adams) v Arsenal many years ago. Not only was he not getting on the end of chances, he was barely good enough on the day to get a touch of the ball. Beatts never looked as if he was going to make a player in his early Rovers days and I think everyone was pleased to get 1m for him at the time. Probably means nothing at all but I would say Derbyshire is showing far more promise after half a dozen first team appearances than Beattie did.

How many 21 year olds have we had playing regular first team football during our 15 years in the Premiership? Not many at all.

Repeating myself here, but he does seem to have an uncanny knack of getting on the end of chances. You can't teach or learn that imo, you've either got it or you haven't. Not only "chances". But strangely enough virtual shoe ins. Far too soon to write him off.

Aye, well, they aren't Spanish are they? I'm afraid I'd have to call that a 0-0 draw. WE haven't brought through anyone who has become a first team REGULAR either. Yet. I have high hopes for Derbyshire and I do wish Hughes would give Gallagher a fair crack. Emerton was rubbish for 4 seasons before this one yet still kept getting picked week in week out. imagine how far Gallagher would have progressed given that kind of run.

Not a criticism of McCarthy as such but he must have been practically impossible to play alongside yesterday due to him dropping so deep on some occasions and peeling off wide to the touchline on others.

He does seem to have the knack of getting on the end of chances though and once he gets over the nervousness of being in the first team the goals may well start to flow. (If he is given the chance that is) For my twopenneth Nonda didn't look any better than Derbyshire when he came on and Jeffers wouldn't even be capable of getting on the end of the sort of chances Derbyshire has missed in the first place.

You would always expect a high mortality rate like that, the thing is, are the ones that stay going to pull up any trees?

Looking in extremely extremely underwhelmed fashion at the sort of players we've been linked with in the transfer window Warnock/Konchesky/Sherringham/Okkas/Boussabon etc it strikes me that the Academy must be in pretty poor shape if we can't bring through some squad cover equal to or better than that lot. You know you're always going to have to spend to bring in some top quality now and again but it's a shame if we're having to import run of the mill talent from outside. Is it time to take a close look at the scouting? Or if not the coaching once they get here? Or do we need to go down the Arsenal route and start investing a lot more money in getting top youngsters to Ewood at an early age?

A quick trawl through the archives revealed the following: LET 05/09: ROVERS PREPARE NEW NEILL DEAL John Williams: "It's still our intention that Lucas will sign a new contract with us and we will be presenting him with a new variation shortly." "He did turn our first offer down before the World Cup but we will be offering him an improved version." LET 13/10: NEW NEILL DEAL PUT ON THE TABLE Mark Hughes: "We've offered him a new contract and it's gone off this week." Sounds daft but doesn't completely contradict what Mark Hughes said in the article of 13/10 above. He went on to say something about "He won't have seen it yet" I'm sure JW/MH/and LN must have spoken since though!