RevidgeBlue

No, but funnily enough they were about twice as wide as modern seating!. Must be some fat bloaters in that part of Yorkshire.

Fantastic draw, Uncle Jack who desperately wanted to win the FA Cup must have been pulling the balls out. PLEASE PLEASE don't let us down guys.

I wasn't fortunate enough to attend on 17/12/2000 and after all the nervous energy expended in looking forward to the occasion I thought the whole thing was a bit of an anticlimax. The coach thing was terrifically well organised but was it really necessary to be sat on them for one hour 15 minutes before moving off? I found the game itself a shade depressing due to the lack of any marked difference in quality between the two sides. Whilst we just about shaded it on possession and chances, what the game did highlight was our appalling lack of quality up front. I have had a recurring nightmare ever since the fifth round draw was made of two goaless draws and going out to the Clampetts at Ewood on pens. After yesterday that scenario moved significantly closer and I just pray we can find a goal or two from somewhere a week on Tuesday. Still think that horrendous miss by Dickov may come back to haunt us. Elsewhere, conditions in the concourse like the black hole of Calcutta, wooden seats, a crap pitch resembling a beach, crap football on it, moronic pitch invasions and a streaker. Welcome back to the 70's. Is this what we want more of in future? Is it hellers like. It was always going to be downhill after putting seven goals without reply past them in 2000/2001 and unfortunately from our point of view, for them, after the draw it is very much pride restored. That's why in my view it would have been best never to have played them again and left the 5-0 drubbing as the final footnote in East Lancs Derby history. All that said my spirits were significantly restored by today's wonderful draw. Does anyone believe in that old tosh about your name being on the cup? Eeerily reminiscent of the Worthy Cup win when we got a particularly straight forward path to the final. It's ripe for a typical Rovers style cock up but the team MUST NOT let us down in ensuring a semi final day out in Cardiff at least.

Be fair CS, I know they were a bit lax not taking the poor little mite 8 days earlier but then they weren't at home!

Flippin' 'eck I've pulled!

A vital game for us, we've had a dismal couple of seasons with not much to shout about and a victory in this tie will go a long way to redressing the balance. I expect nothing less than a fully committed and professional performance because if we play to our full potential and Burnley play to theirs we will win. Question: are the semis at the Millennium this time round? If we win are we just 90 minutes away from a Cardiff return?

The other thing that struck me on reading the summary was that as I recall: 12 months ago we made a tiny operating profit which we were told translated into a £12m loss due to player depreciation. I can see no mention of player depreciation in this summary. Does this mean that by using the same accounting standard and applying straight line player depreciation we lost £24.7m before the profit on transfers? Or does player depreciation not apply this time round for some reason?

You're entitled to your opinion philip as I am to mine but in any other commercially run organisation, officials awarding themselves substantial salary increases on the back of large losses would attract severe criticism. Your Chelski/ManUre comparison is frankly ridiculous. Their turn over is four times ours. That however is largely irrelevant. The point is that they are making large profits as opposed to our large losses. If we were consistently turning in healthy profits then there would be no objection whatsoever with the figures in question rising steadily on an annual basis.

Given our financial situation, have to strongly disagree that John Williams and Tom Finn merit a combined salary of £429k. This has gone up from an already too high £361k last season. At a time income has dropped so substantially, whilst it might be unrealistic for them to have taken a proportionate reduction in salary, there can be no justification whatsoever for this sixteen or seventeen per cent increase. Other than that wonderful to see the continued and dedicated support of the Trust Fund which is obviously allowing players and officials alike to continue to wallow in the comfort zone.

Coming from the pre premiership era and fuelled by his own unique diet of bitter and bensons it's only natural that fans identify with Garner. However I think in his case "greatest" means "most popular" rather than "The best player" For second striker I would place him behind Sutton Newell and my own choice based on the impact he made, Speedie. Those are all players I've seen although really I guess Briggs should be the dispassionate choice.

Assuming we can't bring anyone in who is out of contract, and we're "weeing with the willy we've got" for the rest of the season I think the only hope is to play Stead until one bounces in off his back side because I can only really see a combination of Stead + one other working. I would be tempted to partner him with Jansen but then again I don't see how the latter is performing day in day out in training. He hasn't done badly on the rare occasions he has played though.

We had a look at bringing someone in SG but "it did not prove possible" So that's OK then.

Third straight 1-0 defeat. The last seven Premiership games have finished 1-0 either way! Five goals from the last 11 Premiership games!! Need anyone comment any further? Despite the obvious shortcomings of our front men it seems to me Hughes has tinkered with a formation (4-4-2) that was working reasonably well in order to go 4-5-1 to accomodate Todd and all his new signings Savage Nelsen and Moekena in the same line up. We will go down playing 4-5-1. Stead is the only member of the playing staff with the attributes to possibly make a passable fist of playing as a lone striker but IMO 4-5-1 doesn't work, never has done, never will.

It did work extremely well at Boro away last season, the only time they've played together I think. Glimmer of hope? Charlie Dimmock sent off.

Aye, withiout the "hugely impressive" Dickov we might have drawn a blank and possibly even missed a gift wrapped penalty!. 3rd successive blank coming up today.

Could someone please clarify how this "4 tickets per person" thing works? If you go down initially can you get 4 tickets with 2 away stubs? Or do you need 4 sets of 2 away stubs?

Bit late to be worrying about that!!!

A very good performance in the main tonight but hardly the unmitigated triumph that tash is hailing it as. The bottom line is that Chelsea played particularly poorly yet we came away empty handed from a game we should have picked up at least a point from. How crucial will that be at the end of the season? As already mentioned by most, Savage Mokoena and Nelsen were excellent. Also thought Todd and MGP played very well. On the downside the majority were let down by three shocking indidual performances. Neill probably surpassed Bothroyd's Bolton display to earn the "worst ever premiership performance from a Rovers player" award. If you're picked at right back is it really too much to ask that as a bare minimum you'll at least station yourself in that position requiring the opposition to get round you to cause any damage? Emerton was his usual completely anonymous self. I am starting to get ticked off with these two ripping off the fans and the club with their substandard performances week after week, month after month. Why on earth aren't they dropped in an attempt to give them a much needed kick up the jacksi? Thompson was similarly awful and to me hasn't performed to anything like an acceptable standard since returning from injury. On recent evidence he can no longer cut it at this level. Up front I can not understand the adulation for Dickov. I thought he was quite poor tonight. No end of niggling, plenty of giving away unnecessary fouls, plenty of playing for fouls, plenty of getting caught needlessly offside, and an unnecessary yellow card. No sign of him scoring, making the keeper work, or bringing his teammates into play. Not good enough at this level yet apparently still our main hope. So whilst we seem to have potentially struck gold with Nelsen in defence and Mokoena in front of the back that's now 180 minutes of Ewood Premiership action without a goal. Can we score enough to keep us up? Only time will tell.

We won't get humiliated and I can see it being an extremely tight contest. Trouble is, even if we restrict them to "Nil" can't for the life of me see where a goal from us is going to come from. If anyone fancies a bet on us there are some extremely tasty odds on offer. Rovers to win 6/1 Rovers half time/ full time 14/1 !!!!! Emerton to score 1st 14/1 etc.

The short answer to your first question jim is "no." If it had been my own decision, in the absence of a suitable replacement I would have turned Ferguson's initial transfer request down flat and told him he could leave in the summer. In the event the Board were a lot more accomodating to him than I personally would have been in acceding to his request and setting a fee. When Rangers couldn't afford or wouldn't pay the original fee, Ferguson was outrageously taking the wotsit in allegedly refusing to play against Colchester. He was clearly in breach of contract so personally I would have sent him home without pay until such time as he was prepared to make himself available for selection. A couple of weeks should have been enough to have Mrs. Ferguson chewing at her husband's ear. As it is we are substantially weakened in midfield for the rest of the season. Yes we have the money, (£2m balance) but it's a huge gamble, this will seem extremely small beer if we are relegated. And if anything I think today's revelations make us look even weaker than previously if that's possible. Barry Ferguson throws a hissy fit, spits his dummy out so we bend over backwards to rush through a last minute deal so he can have his own way. A price quoted for a player is no longer THE price. And Rangers having flogged us an overpriced player are laughing all the way to the Bank having bought him back on the cheap. The thing is I think a very dangerous precedent has been set here. Now I can't see anything to stop this happening again. Anyone fancying a move only has to pull the same sort of stunt and if we try to resist they will be entitled to ask "If it worked for Barry, why not for me?"

Disgusted with this. On Thursday the asking price was quite rightly a guaranteed £6m and not a penny less. We then maintain up a show of false bravado until predictably in many ways caving in at the last minute giving us no chance to secure a replacement. I really do think John Williams position is untenable following this shambles. How can Ferguson's value depreciate by £1.5m in 4 days? Makes Rangers initial estimation of depreciation on him of £3.5m over 18 months look positively generous. Furthermore a) Players now know they can walk out of Blackburn Rovers at any time with little or no opposition. Other Clubs will know we are a particularly soft touch in the transfer market. Whenever we quote a price for one of our players they know that isn't really the real price. Conversely we always seem to end up paying top dollar for players. ie in the case of nr 31 yr old Savage, useful acquisition though he undoubtedly is. Dunn, Duff, Cole for nothing and Ferguson at a substantial undervaluation. And people wonder why the ground is one third empty.

My thoughts exactly. Signing Savage and the two defenders and retaining Ferguson for the rest of the season at least would have been a reasonable window. Instead of which with two hours 45 mins to go it's looking increasingly likely we're going to lose our best midfielder without a replacement and the real problem positions up front haven't even been addressed.

So what is he doing in Scotland then? Family christening; aye alright. Apparently De Pedro had a bar mitzah a few days ago in Perugia as well... Ferguson badly wants out and is doing all he can to make it happen. Nothing of Ferguson's behaviour over the period of his Rovers life leads me to believe that if he stayed he would give his all for the club and keep us safe from relegation. He's best out the club, why cannot that be seen? Is my interpretation so different from everybody elses? Am I on my own here? The man does not want to be here or he wouldn't be courting Rangers like a frustrated old spinster after her last chance. Am I missing something? What has been wrong with his performances on the pitch for the club? Nothing as far as I can tell. Granted he hasn't been the Keane or Viera we maybe hoped but that's one of those things.

Only ourselves to blame if we don't progress to the last 8.

Tin hats on!