Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
17 hours ago, toogs said:

And me. And me Dad. Would have been 4 less if us 4 hadn’t gone. At least this was an era when you could believe the attendance. 

Me and my dad also there. 

Bet if we added up everyone who claimed to be there the crowd would be well over 3,000 😉

Posted
31 minutes ago, JBiz said:

Just to be clear, it’s not guilt. I don’t think this boycott will achieve anything other than a louder echo, or a load of nonsensical shit from the 168 Watford fans who turn up.

What bothers me is I’m effectively forced to be in a divided group from other fans, because I paid for a season ticket last year and I don’t want to miss opportunities to take my dad out for the day. Even though we both agree with the idea that the owners have to sell up.
 

That’s what he wants to do btw, because he’s done it for 60 years, so going to Darwen or Chorley isn’t a solution. I suggested staying in the club or staying down for the first ten minutes, but you can’t blame him for sticking to his guns.

I have had a season ticket since 1990, but right now I’m done. My attending going forward is solely based on what family want to do. 

Personally I don't think anyone should feel in the least bit guilty either for going, or for adhering to the call for a boycott, or even for organising the boycott.

Everyone has to do what they feel is right for them and I assume everyone wants the same thing ultimately which is a successful Club.

  • Like 2
  • Fair point 3
Posted

Could turn out to be Steve Kean, and that he's been working undercover for 15 years to expose the Venkys, which meant he had to temporarily pose as a Premier League manager in order to get on the inside. That would be exciting.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, StHelensRover said:

Could turn out to be Steve Kean, and that he's been working undercover for 15 years to expose the Venkys, which meant he had to temporarily pose as a Premier League manager in order to get on the inside. That would be exciting.

For the Harry Potter nerds, a Severus Snape type role. And when we’re free of this ownership people will name their kids Steve for generations to come, in recognition of his extraordinary sacrifice, torpedoing his own coaching career for the good of BRFC. 
 

In reality, I suspect he’s actually the Peter Pettigrew role, betraying Allardyce (James Potter) in servitude of the Dark Lord (Jerome Anderson)… who coincidentally rose back to power roughly 13 years after his disappearance 😳😳😳😳

Edited by Jimmy612
  • Like 2

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...