wilsdenrover Posted 1 hour ago Author Posted 1 hour ago (edited) 1 hour ago, Bronzed A Donis said: Do you suspect they are keeping hold of Brockhall in case of any sale / Admin they have a bargaining chip to squeeze out extra cash of any possible buyer to buy it back? They could presumably return it to the club or charge a peppercorn rent? neither happening. Re the admin element of this. I’m not sure how they could Rovers into administration whilst simultaneously claiming the holding company is solvent. If the holding company was the one put into administration the administrators would also then be in control of Rovers + the company which owns the training ground. I doubt they’d decide the thing to do was to sell them to two separate people. Edited 50 minutes ago by wilsdenrover Goy my two/to the wrong way round!! 1 Quote
wilsdenrover Posted 55 minutes ago Author Posted 55 minutes ago 9 minutes ago, RevidgeBlue said: Ah ok. I'll bow to your superior knowledge. 🙂 Thought you'd always said previously they had their "investment" in the Club down at £220m. At £33.5m it's somewhat more attractive especially if Brockhall is included. Equity (ie turned into shares) £86 million Debt £134 million Total £220 million I presumed the 25% relates just to the debt element but perhaps someone else can confirm?? 2 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.