Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Bronzed A Donis said:

Do you suspect they are keeping hold of Brockhall in case of any sale / Admin they have a bargaining chip to squeeze out extra cash of any possible buyer to buy it back?

They could presumably return it to the club or charge a peppercorn rent?  neither happening.

Re the admin element of this.

I’m not sure how they could Rovers into administration whilst simultaneously claiming the holding company is solvent.

If the holding company was the one put into administration the administrators would also then be in control of Rovers + the company which owns the training ground.

I doubt they’d decide the thing to do was to sell them to two separate people. 

 

 

 

 

Edited by wilsdenrover
Goy my two/to the wrong way round!!
  • Like 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, RevidgeBlue said:

Ah ok. I'll bow to your superior knowledge. 🙂

Thought you'd always said previously they had their "investment" in the Club down at £220m.

At £33.5m it's somewhat more attractive especially if Brockhall is included.

Equity (ie turned into shares) £86 million

Debt £134 million

Total £220 million

I presumed the 25% relates just to the debt element but perhaps someone else can confirm??

  • Like 3
Posted
1 hour ago, wilsdenrover said:

Re the admin element of this.

I’m not sure how they could Rovers into administration whilst simultaneously claiming the holding company is solvent.

If the holding company was the one put into administration the administrators would also then be in control of Rovers + the company which owns the training ground.

I doubt they’d decide the thing to do was to sell them to two separate people. 

 

 

 

 

If they aren't putting money into the holding company and that just exists on debt from some Indian Bank or something it would maybe have to be them that forced the issue ?

But if that debt is secured on a thousand acres of land in Pune or a half a billion pound turnover company that's probably very unlikely.

We better stop dreaming 😞

  • Like 1
Posted
9 hours ago, Herbie6590 said:

2.17% over base on an unsecured overdraft is pretty competitive TBH. 

Is that over base on an Indian base rate or a UK base rate? If overdraft has gone up £8 million and interest gone up over £1 million doesn't look that competitive. That looks like 12.5 per cent to me.

Posted
45 minutes ago, Rogerb said:

Is that over base on an Indian base rate or a UK base rate? If overdraft has gone up £8 million and interest gone up over £1 million doesn't look that competitive. That looks like 12.5 per cent to me.

UK base rate.

  • Like 1
Posted
55 minutes ago, Rogerb said:

Is that over base on an Indian base rate or a UK base rate? If overdraft has gone up £8 million and interest gone up over £1 million doesn't look that competitive. That looks like 12.5 per cent to me.

The overdraft figure in the accounts is at a single point in time (the date the accounts closed- 31/3/25) - it doesn’t break down how many days at what ever level of usage.

You could take the interest charge paid from the P&L (c.£2m) , the interest rate charged (say 7% - Base Plus Margin) & calculate the average balance…

So c.£2m paid in interest for the year at say 7% implies a £28.5m average balance through the period for example. 

 

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)
12 minutes ago, wilsdenrover said:

UK base rate.

 As per Herbie's post above suggests the overdraft has been considerably higher during the year.

Edited by Rogerb
Posted
31 minutes ago, Herbie6590 said:

The overdraft figure in the accounts is at a single point in time (the date the accounts closed- 31/3/25) - it doesn’t break down how many days at what ever level of usage.

You could take the interest charge paid from the P&L (c.£2m) , the interest rate charged (say 7% - Base Plus Margin) & calculate the average balance…

So c.£2m paid in interest for the year at say 7% implies a £28.5m average balance through the period for example. 

 

Would it be cynical to wonder if Venkys London and Rovers have different accounting periods so things like year end overdraft figures can be ‘manipulated’?

  • Like 1
Posted
Just now, wilsdenrover said:

Would it be cynical to wonder if Venkys London and Rovers have different accounting periods so things like year end overdraft figures can be ‘manipulated’?

It’s a classic tax planning technique…but VLL isn’t profitable so not sure how much manipulation is realistically possible. 🤷‍♂️

Overdraft is relatively easy to window-dress as for instance debtors can be pressured to pay up in the run up to the accounting year end, credit taken can increase (keeping cash in the bank) etc.

I seem to recall sometime, somewhere reading that football clubs are encouraged have to have a June 30th year end for regulatory/reporting consistency…

Venky’s India has a March 31st y/e so that makes consolidation easier at that level. 

  • Thanks 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...