Jump to content

Blue blood

Members
  • Posts

    6366
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    13

Everything posted by Blue blood

  1. Great win. It's a crazy league. A couple of wins and you shoot up the table, a few without winning and you're looking down nervously. Reading about other teams it seems that most go on runs of good and poor form, you hope there's enough lengthy runs to get something. The something in our case will be survival. Wins vs Boro and Leeds are unexpected and whilst both games suit Eustace's backs to the wall approach, the quality in both teams makes the results very impressive. Still worried we aren't scoring many. That'll be a challenge long term but teams are built from the back which is something positive. Also don't like not having a penalty taker. Don't think that will end well for us. Overall though a good win. 2 clean sheets and I think it's enough to keep relegation worries firmly at bay.
  2. The mind boggles. I guess the two of them are similar in that they both got a team to the play off final. Mind you Lamps had a much better squad, bigger budget and favourable Chelsea loans so it's not a like for like comparison. Factor in the Wembly semi final and being unlucky not to be in the final. The fact that he took the club which was a mess to two promotions. And you see straight off Robins is much better manager. Only an idiot would say otherwise. Seems like there's a lot of idiots in football.
  3. They also ha e a ridiculous amount of money and talent. I'm not that sympathetic.
  4. Remember a game vs Boro years ago when the pitch was spectacularly waterlogged and yet we still played. I think we won and Woodgate was rubbish? I'm sure our cost cutting would have not helped the situation. Not sure whether it tipped the balance or was immaterial but it's pretty crap our motto is every little hinders.
  5. Lol, quick! You're right though, it doesn't need you to be an economist it's plain common sense. Are you really suggesting that halving our supporter base is good for the long term viability for the club or the town businesses? Are you really saying an extra 12k match day supporters wouldn't benefit the town or club? You may say it's peanuts compared to who works for the club but what happens at the next round of downsizing or when we inevitably fall into league 1? What happens in 20 years time when we have a further reduced fanbase? Bar Wharton all the players sold to keep the lights on or get the goals to keep us up cost money - Armstrong, Sami, Brereton. What's going to happen now the production line is slowing? If you can't see the downward trend of the club and the impact that has on people and businesses I'm not going to convince you. But it seems pretty plain to see.
  6. I'm no economist but I'm fairly sure that the loss of over 12k regular fans might have had an impact on local businesses and the like. I dare say Swag's cost cutting measures haven't helped us boost the local economy either.
  7. You are welcome. Give it another few years and the paraphrase will be altered again, and not for the better.
  8. Good post. Agree with the gist of this but not sure all of those are of squad filler standard. Britain, Pears, Gueye and Hedges definitely aren't! Leonard I don't think we've seen enough of to know either way, likewise Baath. Siggy and Buckley I think have the talent to be squad players but need to show more consistency to warrant a wage here. You are spot on though that so many players are being asked to do a role which is too much for them. To paraphrase a famous quote from here "buy league one players, get league oen football." .
  9. I don't think a full season prior to this can be helping him at all either! Players need a break. Nor is it our fault we've a) not brought in enough strikers and b) those we have are not good enough.
  10. Cardiff are pretty naff too so I expect at least a point. New manager bounce won't last forever for them. Their squad isn't any better than ours, and given Cardiff will see it as winnable I reckon that suits our sit back and grind out a win "plan".
  11. I also thought that wage wise with our 2 aging centre backs this year. Surely one of better quality would have been more logical. I know you need 4 but having 3 decent (ha ha) is better than having 2 duds as cover.
  12. I'd forgotten he was on the books which says it all really.
  13. Stupid, stupid decision by Coventry. First off when you look at what he has done over seven years - he's had them performing really well, and transformed the club's position, with a couple of very near misses on big success. Even looking in the short term,recently they have beaten Boro and Luton, two decent sides, so the signs of recovery this year were there. It's an appalling decision.
  14. Looking at the table two teams are already falling away. Portsmouth I think are doomed, they don't look good enough, so we are already down to 2 spaces. Again, I think we might be saved by three worse teams. The worry is this yesr there are fewer candidates then the previous season.
  15. Of the limited amount I've seen/heard and read of Rovers this season it's utterly clear that the bargain basement approach is really coming home to roost. No quality offensively and no one to step up - in fact most of our top scorers have all needed a season or two to bed in - means that the issues in attack has been carefully crafted over the past couple of years. Of our attacking options, where do you start? The Japanese lad was worth a punt. We've always had punts to find strikers - remember Jeffers and Fowler. Difference was back then these punts were combined with investment in strikers and proven talent. As it is I think he's probably an OK squad player/impact sub and probably plays at the level of the team. He won't pull the team up, but in a decent squad as a squad player he'd not disgrace himself. Can see why we went for him, just his role in the team is above his level. Gueye - looks lost and a few levels above his ability. That said since he's meant to make it awkward for defences, which is his best (using the term relatively) skill, having no one up front to capitalise is a waste of his very limited talents. Imagine playing Roberts up front under Hughes on his own, he'd have had a fraction of the impact. Misuse aside he's not much use. Weimann - when someone is released by a lower mid table championship outfit the wrong side of 30, alarm bells should be ringing. If he's not good enough for a limited Bristol side, who are where we "aspire " to be, why bring him in? A worrying transfer, whose asset of experience is overly magnified by the derth of it elsewhere. Dolan - controversially I like him. He's a one trick pony but when it works it's very good. Problem is it only works about 1 in every 3 or 4 games. In other games he's useless. In a squad game having Dolan in the squad as an option for when it works or you want something different is fine. When you are relying on something that, perhaps charitably, only works a third or quarter of the time, and it's that integral to your plans, it's asking for trouble. Hedges - the forward version of Jason Lowe. A good engine but a useless footballer well above his level. Cantwell- to me he's an enhancer and creator, whose usefulness is massively undermined by the fact we a) have forwards who can't finish chances and b) have no pace or good movement in the rest of the front line. With that being the case, and him needing to play in the hole - when all our striking options need someone up front with them - we really aren't going to get the best out of him. Leonard - jury still out for me on him. Better than other young players I've seen and has potential but yet to be convinced. The formarion - whilst our defensive mids are probably our strongest area, having both in the team means we are essentially playing with 6 defenders and 4 very limited attackers. With only 4 offensive players it's not a good start even before we consider their quality. The rest of the team has to offer more going forwards. As I type I recognise the issue is probably more with the defence than the 2 sitting mids. If the full backs offered more going forwards. - and probably.JRC could/should fulfil this - then 2 sitting mids is less of an issue. That said if the centre defence wasn't ancient/slow/poor the full backs could push up more. Even without Venkys stinginess we couldn't alter a whole team so two strong defensive mids is fine, if the rest of the team is any good. But ahead and behind they aren't really. Rant over but it's no wonder we don't score.
  16. I think the squad reminds me a little of the one under Coyle. We had 4 good options up top but were threadbare in other places. Feel like it's similar now in that regard.
  17. Dunno if it's injury fitness or age but in this case Kane is looking like the international version of Rhodes. Great finisher but no pace or presence.
  18. Disagree on how many slices we are due. Given the easier draws we have had tournament after tournament I'd say we've a fair bit of luck
  19. Not sure how that was a penalty. Sure the guy was late and maybe due a card but the ball was well gone out of play before he connected.
  20. Absolutely. And both are players who looked class when you were on top of the game but quickly vanished when the going gets marginally tough. Making that sort of guy captain is just making the problem worse.
  21. I'm not saying it's the right or wrong way but the best way. Um, I think by saying it is the best way then by definition you are saying its the right way. English not his strong point. Anyway fair play to the guy on his achievement. He now has as many successes as Owen Coyle to go with all the dross. Well done. A managerial legend in the making.
  22. Basket case decision by a basket case club. Obviously they are Arsenal fans these owners because Pochettino had started to get some results and had them qualify for Europe, which was clearly too much success for their liking. Not that 6th was a huge achievement for what was spent mind.
  23. If the losses/"investment needed" are near £20 million again then there's surely some financial con on top of whatever other naferous lengthy plot they have going. Inconceivable with the amounts generated, the vastly reduced playing budget and lower operating costs that we can be anywhere near that.
  24. Indeed which is why I'm delighted that City won it. They wanted a closed shop for the bug boys and are now worried the shop is closed and smaller than they wanted. Good! They reap what they sow.
×
×
  • Create New...