I wish I could still be in denial about BB.

Cheers. Which one dismissed it, Myers? I'm sure you'll let us know when the others reply.

Would you mind mate? I don't really use Twitter.

Has anyone pestered the LT journos for info on the BA link? Chaddy, I'm looking at you.

I'm gonna get a bit excited. Even Madon said it could be cobblers, but dammit, it's been such a dull window I wanna dream a bit. Maybe learn to have a little tug about it like @Oldgregg86

That was Marcus Maddison.

Oh dear! You don't have to put your connections at risk to sate the frothing masses, you know. We will salivate on snippets and teasers, especially in a quiet window. Just ask Nicko You can just tell us who it is when it's close to breaking anyway. Your source probably wouldn't mind so much then.

Good player though right? I think he just isn't a Pulis style player. Been shunted out on the wing someone was saying, and still has roughly 1 in 3. The wages make me question whether it is possible, but I think he'd be an excellent signing...if used right (there's the rub). Could see him being pushed wide here too. Or maybe we are planning to transition to two up top.

Most people masturbate. But you masterbate, because you're a true master at it. We salute you, and your transfer speculation related w@nking skills.

Nope, you told me you didn't think it fits the profile and that it's unlikely. I never asked you about that. I asked what you think if it does happen. Would it be a good signing, etc. Do you really think if you'd answered the question, I'd have pointed out that you didn't? If someone says something like that, I'd recommend you go back and read what they asked you, and think whether you answered it. Easier than me typing all this out on my phone.

We are going for both, or you've both heard it and are speculating? Not to be picky, I just want to be clear. Cheers.

You lost me with the opposites bit?

That's not what I asked though.

Cheers. Have you heard that it would be both him and Gally, or are you speculating on that part?

Doesn't necessarily mean anything. Do you have thoughts on this as a transfer if it does happen?

Conspiracy theory here, but I could see someone higher up thinking it's a good idea to have a bid accepted knowing we won't be able to agree personal terms. Then you turn around and say we tried but the player wanted too much for our wage structure. But at least we look ambitious to the fans...

70%? What does that mean in real terms? Sounds kinda like fee more or less agreed but personal terms not discussed yet? Any idea whether this is permanent or loan to a view (presumably with a big loan fee)?

The loss we took on him, you'd think so.

You can hide. But I will find you. And I will kill you.

Even Rhodes was sold at a profit, and we sold several of the players in the list for more than we bought Rhodes for. I can only think of a few who we spent money on to make a loss.

Do you?? As in, the ins and outs are similar total figures? I highly doubt that. Surely we have recouped at least double what we have spent in fees. Venkys' losses have been in covering wages (and at one time, agent fees) with so little natural income at the club.

He was very good today. Played well for much of the Ipswich game too. Not long ago he looked lost at RB.

Well I tried to change it promptly to Neophox's, as I realised that was who he was quoting originally. But it seems you saw it too quickly to be spared.

I think he's saying he would have sex with Neophox's daughter. Good news, right? What he's been waiting for?

Someone claims, not points out. Doesn't seem very likely based on what we've seen and heard about him before.