In fairness to Chaddy… That article both quotes Ismael as saying he wants 90% by the first day of pre season AND as saying the trip is later in pre-season than usual so that 90% can be on it.

When the Venkys first went to court the reason for wanting the money sending was set out as the below: No mention of potential job losses, detriment to the team etc - purely ‘we’d lose all our money and people will think we’re useless’ - I find that very telling. Well, funnily enough (dickheads) you’re not getting your money back and people know you’re a bunch of incompetent buffoons. In summary, fuck off Venkys.

malevolent.

with the club trying to spin it as a good thing.

We could try Sheffield United’s approach of buying players we don’t have the money to pay for.

They went to court because they didn’t want to pay any bond at all, whether they’ll be ‘happy’ to pay the 50% is anyone’s guess. I don’t think there’s been any official confirmation re transfer fees as the question hasn’t been asked (judge that as you will…) If as a result of the judge’s order there is a shortfall I think we’re limited on who we could sell to raise the funds (another loan on the training ground maybe…) I’m sure others will comment on your final sentence 😁.

Maybe the court would approve money being sent over for transfers but Venkys would need to ask to find out.

Club requested £4.85 million so… Venkys send club £3.2 million and pay a £1.6 million bond. £1.6 million for the club to find, who wants to bet against that ending up being the fee agreed for Travis…

The sum requested is worded as to ‘fulfill its statutory and contractual obligations’ I don’t see how this can include money for potential transfers. Edited to add… The court doesn’t issue the NoC but orders the authorities to do so (subject to Venkys meeting the conditions this and previous court orders have set). However… Venkys got an NoC issued in March ‘24 without the need to go to court - presumably because they just stumped up the guarantee ‘no questions asked’ that time.

Rovers requested the money 26th March Venkys filed an appeal with the court 22nd April Hearing confirms funds can be sent 26th May Venkys send Rovers the money ??????

They can split the club a million ways if they wish. It’s still supposed to be the CEO in overall control.

The Rays - Silhouettes

It’s beyond obvious Suhail is in charge, what makes them so reluctant to make this official? 🤔🤨

Is it just me or does that description sound more like a COO’s responsibilities?

https://www.printfriendly.com/print?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.lancashiretelegraph.co.uk%2Fsport%2F25190722.blackburn-rovers-boost-contract-talks-star-player%2F "There have been no talks yet. That's all I can really say about it at the moment. I'm happy here."

Maybe he’s assuming we are only as clever as he is.

Rovers, at the forefront of equality 😁😁

(So long as the statements are coherent) I just don’t see that as an issue myself. The club are blanking the coalition because they’re running scared, not because (for example) their syntax might not be perfect.

I’d choose Glen’s et al drive and determination to improve our club over them being able to produce a literary masterpiece.

Looking good for Celtic next season: https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/cm2692qe2v1o

That ship sailed years ago.

https://www.printfriendly.com/print?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.lancashiretelegraph.co.uk%2Fsport%2F25210273.blackburns-brittain-transfer-ultimatum-domino-impact%2F