Jump to content

wilsdenrover

Members
  • Posts

    8903
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    62

Everything posted by wilsdenrover

  1. He could have revealed that ‘info’ at any moment, I wonder why he has chosen now.
  2. It reminded me of something I’d seen somewhere before 🤔
  3. https://www.rovers.co.uk/fans/fans-forum Accessed through Google - watch them remove it entirely now though…
  4. Have you seen their most recent trademark application? (UK00004264329)
  5. Found these through QPR’s website and thought they might be helpful:
  6. Their ‘keeper was sent off for denying an obvious goal scoring opportunity which is a 1 game ban (+ a £20 fine 😬).
  7. When we were doing well I don’t recall us giving them a second thought. They on the other hand…
  8. This is decided on a case by case basis. The rumour was Sheffield Wednesday were/are restricted to £7,000 per week.
  9. £220 million at the last count. One day there’s going to be one hell off a write off.
  10. Queen - Too Much Love Will Kill You
  11. Which would you put in each of those categories?
  12. It’s A Man’s Man’s Man’s World - James Brown
  13. That was in relation to the 26th May order, the one which reduced the guarantee requirement to 50%.
  14. I’m pretty certain it can be reduced.
  15. Never heard of that and read it as syphilis 😁
  16. When they’re allocating new dates quite a lot of the barristers argue for this to be ASAP. There wasn’t a single comment from the Venky’s one 🧐
  17. I think they’ve just said the next date will be January 15th.
  18. I’m not sure they’re aware 🤦‍♂️
  19. Court hasn’t finished for the day yet. I don’t think it has or will be heard but they are still having issues with the mics so I can’t be sure. Judge is currently looking incredibly bored 😁
  20. Why is Tronstad allowed to consider non footballing reasons?
  21. I can chat to them but I don’t want to risk getting kicked out 😁😁
  22. Somebody calling themselves Venkateshwara Hatcheries are now in the virtual court room. Not had that before.
  23. Lots of mic issues with the court today so not sure but I don’t think the case is going to be heard.
  24. It would be interesting to hear their argument for why this scrutiny should be removed.
×
×
  • Create New...