wilsdenrover

We don’t have a game in hand.

Playing to his audience.

If you listen carefully you’ll hear them crying into their Liverpool hankies.

100 rubber chickens for them. 3 points for us.

Isn’t he currently banned for a racist comment?

Stokes: Starts the day electing to bat Ends the day with a five for.

Mr Mister - Broken Wings

Seeing the Aussie smugness turn to panic was nice.

Don’t even get it out the bag yet… 31-4

Oh dear https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/ckgkg1d49v7o

How silly of me 🤦‍♂️

To state the obvious… This is fine if the youngsters are good enough, it isn’t if they’re not.

and they get no credit for keeping him anyway, this was solely down to him being a fan.

That would come under serious missed incident. I was just talking about clear and obvious error.

For me, I think the VAR should get one replay, at full speed, from the nearest angle to which the ref had. If that isn’t enough to show an error then, in my eyes, a clear and obvious one can’t have occurred.

https://www.theifab.com/laws/latest/video-assistant-referee-var-protocol/#principles

Manic Street Preachers - A Design For Life

Always trying to integrate is Steve…

Would they have made him captain if an issue like this was on the horizon? Actually, given who ‘they’ are I’ll answer my own question with a yes.

Isn’t that, to a point, the same thing?

As we’re now fully off topic and you mentioned offside… Why can an attacking player be considered to be not interfering with play but a defensive one cannot?

The Vince Grella suite will need an extension.

I thought it was a penalty when it happened but I don’t think the ‘error’ in not awarding it was clear and obvious. I’m also not a fan of them using slow mo, freeze frames or closeups - for me that just proves the original decision can’t have been obviously wrong. Personally I’d scrap VAR as I think there’s more bad to it than good.

Do you still have it?

The results are a consequence of them being complete twats so I guess in a way he was right.