wilsdenrover

Don’t be mean about Scotland.

Would it be cynical to wonder if Venkys London and Rovers have different accounting periods so things like year end overdraft figures can be ‘manipulated’?

UK base rate.

Can’t get anything past me 😁😁

I wonder what the ban would’ve been if a fan had spat at him.

I think the FIFA peace prize may have been rigged.

Jermaine Stewart - We Don’t Have To Take Our Clothes Off

Two guesses. Are you hedging your bet.

That doesn’t sound like what happened to Bury - I thought that’s what would come next.

Equity (ie turned into shares) £86 million Debt £134 million Total £220 million I presumed the 25% relates just to the debt element but perhaps someone else can confirm??

Re the admin element of this. I’m not sure how they could Rovers into administration whilst simultaneously claiming the holding company is solvent. If the holding company was the one put into administration the administrators would also then be in control of Rovers + the company which owns the training ground. I doubt they’d decide the thing to do was to sell them to two separate people.

Football related debtors are currently at £5.1 million. Potential add ons are £20 million. It could be a while yet… (let’s hope the add on criteria aren’t met!)

The debt element is currently £134 million so the 25% is ‘only’ £33.5 million. Would someone pay that if it was all they had to pay?

And it could well be why they refuse to write off any of the debt (something it appears the auditor feel they should do…)

I believe you’re on the naughty list.

But the bank has reserved the right to ask for one.

7

Average operating loss for the five years pre Venkys £860,000 Average operating loss under the Venkys £16.12 million Oh, and to put that £212 million ‘benefit’ into context… In the past 7 years Brighton have received £828.7 million more broadcasting income than we have.

If we all went and all asked the same question…

Do you think they’ll let @glen9mullan attend? 😁

This is your moment..

Well there is that 😄 I was just offering a better convoluted option than the club is 😁😁😁

Surely data should identify if a player is worth looking at and eyes should decide whether we actually try to sign them.

How about four matches where each one you attend gets progressively cheaper? ie. first £25, second £20 third £15 fourth £10. Go to them all and you’ve averaged out at £17.50. Perhaps even make it any four matches rather than them having to be consecutive.

Yep, but is them Venkys or the auditor… ’interesting’ development either way.