Jump to content

wilsdenrover

Members
  • Posts

    8621
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    60

Everything posted by wilsdenrover

  1. It reminded me of something I’d seen somewhere before 🤔
  2. https://www.rovers.co.uk/fans/fans-forum Accessed through Google - watch them remove it entirely now though…
  3. Have you seen their most recent trademark application? (UK00004264329)
  4. Found these through QPR’s website and thought they might be helpful:
  5. Their ‘keeper was sent off for denying an obvious goal scoring opportunity which is a 1 game ban (+ a £20 fine 😬).
  6. When we were doing well I don’t recall us giving them a second thought. They on the other hand…
  7. This is decided on a case by case basis. The rumour was Sheffield Wednesday were/are restricted to £7,000 per week.
  8. £220 million at the last count. One day there’s going to be one hell off a write off.
  9. Queen - Too Much Love Will Kill You
  10. Which would you put in each of those categories?
  11. It’s A Man’s Man’s Man’s World - James Brown
  12. That was in relation to the 26th May order, the one which reduced the guarantee requirement to 50%.
  13. I’m pretty certain it can be reduced.
  14. Never heard of that and read it as syphilis 😁
  15. When they’re allocating new dates quite a lot of the barristers argue for this to be ASAP. There wasn’t a single comment from the Venky’s one 🧐
  16. I think they’ve just said the next date will be January 15th.
  17. I’m not sure they’re aware 🤦‍♂️
  18. Court hasn’t finished for the day yet. I don’t think it has or will be heard but they are still having issues with the mics so I can’t be sure. Judge is currently looking incredibly bored 😁
  19. Why is Tronstad allowed to consider non footballing reasons?
  20. I can chat to them but I don’t want to risk getting kicked out 😁😁
  21. Somebody calling themselves Venkateshwara Hatcheries are now in the virtual court room. Not had that before.
  22. Lots of mic issues with the court today so not sure but I don’t think the case is going to be heard.
  23. It would be interesting to hear their argument for why this scrutiny should be removed.
  24. You’d have thought that but this is the Venkys we’re talking about.
×
×
  • Create New...