wilsdenrover

They paid around £21 million. Within 18 months that sum was almost matched by profit on player sales.

I wonder if we filled this vacancy… https://irecruit.efl.com/popups/displayfile.aspx?StoredFilePathID=AQmvdpkZgAYNZ7wWGf93AQ

Eels - That Look You Give That Guy

Give it a couple of years.

I read that as five Mowbrays 😁😁

You realise they’re just saying things to get a reaction?

One man’s nostalgia is another man’s history book 😄 I love hearing these stories 😀

Side boob Rao?

It’s a budget, it’s just not a championship one.

Made me think of Dr Seuss 😄

What are the 999,999 others?

Got Toth back in the team.

yes

Stunning save by Gordon.

The reverse Wharton.

We’ve reached my level 😁😁

wears the soap.

Especially when De Neve’s in shot.

and what a night that was 😁

Until it’s five to two.

Rewarding them financially would be an unfortunate byproduct - the aim would be to have a visually impactful protest - 1,000s of fans (potentially a majority of the crowd) turning their backs/holding up red cards (other options may be available). The only thing (imo) which will have a chance of impacting Pasha/Venkys is bad publicity. I (maybe wrongly) see a very low crowd and a high crowd full of protesters as equally achieving this aim. I (again maybe wrongly) think persuading people to return for one match should be easier than persuading people to miss one.

Apologies if this has already been suggested: Perhaps a match should be chosen where those who no longer go to Ewood return ‘en masse’ to carry out such a protest. The impact could be two fold - an obvious spike in crowd numbers and the protest ‘moment’ itself (both of which the coalition would publicise). After all if those who don’t wish to boycott are being told it’s just one match (to miss) isn’t the reverse, it’s just one match (to attend) true as well?

All fart no poo. Again.

Convince the sceptics, ignore the cynics.