wilsdenrover

Too old, too short, dingle

What’s the point of a deadline if it isn’t a deadline?

Perhaps you could let me know which shareholding number I should be looking out for… From your likes I’m guessing number 37.

If I was a betting man I’d say the first thing which would happen is the training ground being borrowed against again.

Why only half?

Which is it? 1. A contract has been signed with someone else without Macron being allowed to exercise their option. 2 Macron matched the highest offer but a contract was signed with someone else anyway.

I could be wrong but I don’t think the EFL does deal sheets.

The last money sent from India was to cover obligations until June. We’ve therefore not had the money (from the owners) to meet obligations for July and August. Sounds like financial dire straits to me.

A player can’t be recalled earlier than 4 weeks after the loan begins however any recall has to be agreed by both clubs and the player (and take place whilst the window is open).

Current court hearing is because they want need to send across £12.6 million. Current court hearing will be because they don’t want to have to pay the bond as well. If the judge says the bond conditions remain do Venkys: a) send the money and pay the bond? b) not send the money and the shit hits the fan? I’m going with b.

We’ll do well to get 0.

meanie

Well they are wankers.

It may depend on whether any decision by the Adjudicating Authority is deemed to be a conviction (I don’t think it will be). If it was, they may be caught by 2.1.8(b)(i) of the Owners’ and Directors’ Test (under disqualify event)

He’ll let you know once the club has spoken.

Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery.

Would you steak your life on that?

Please don’t let the Venkys be part of the 5%.

They need to ‘defend’ themselves to the Adjudicating Authority but them saying they intend to do so (if indeed they do*) may well get brought up on Wednesday. * I think we all know they will. Re your new show analogy - do you think we’re at the stage where we know it will be shit but we’re sticking with it anyways 😁😁

Sell on fees are the only financial commitments a club is allowed to make whilst under a fee restriction.

As every one seems to be in here, I’ve done a little update in the Venky court case thread. I wouldn’t rush to go read it though but just so you all know it’s there…

@paullarrygher Delhi High Court updated their website a while ago, perhaps that’s why it no longer loads for you? This is the link I use https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/

Point 3 is the interesting one for me, this complaint (if I’ve understood the procedure correctly) is the ED saying to the Adjudicating Authority that they believe the Venkys have a case to answer (re their investigation). Respondent no 2 is the Directorate of Enforcement. edited to add: Just checked and it’s listed as the sixth case to be heard on Wednesday - who thinks I need to set my alarm??