wilsdenrover

The 25% rule covers all non footballing creditors not just owners but I agree it rewards them. I believe there’s a 15 point deduction for failing to comply with this rule - I think we’d all take that in exchange for Venkys not getting a penny…

I think it would be nearer £33 million as it will exclude money that’s been converted into shares.

It does now. It didn’t pre Venkys. edited to add: Total losses for last 5 pre Venky years = £9 million Total for last 5 available Venky years (to June ‘24) = £87.8 million Both figures are before player trading, the second figure also excludes the sale of the training ground.

They bought a club that had lost a few million pounds over the previous 5 years. Every penny they’ve had to put in is as a result of their own incompetence. I echo your final sentence.

13th most points, 14th most matches. Suggests our ‘natural position’ is mid-table PL - roughly where we were when Venkys appeared. 🤔🤔

Around 3,500 down on last year’s official attendance vs Watford.

Around three and a half thousand down on last season’s official figure vs Watford.

Based on the Gestede calls, we’d be offered £250k and by the time Rudy had finished we’d be receiving £125k.

I think they’re saying just enough for us to have no idea what they’re saying 🤔 The alternative is I’m stupid - it could well be that one 😄😄

Is the negotiator the diversion or is Rovers insider? Or are they both diversions…

That’s very kind.

In the modern world you can take full responsibility but not lose your job.

Losing when playing well isn’t a good sign. Admittedly losing and playing as shit as us is worse.

Will we save West Brom or will they save us?

When everyone is back, not some, not most, all.

I’ve been called many things but never that 😄

I think so, registrations can only take place during a window but he’s already registered with us. Edited to add: Thats definitely the case with domestic loans, I’ll see if I can find the rules for international ones. Edited again… There’s nothing I can see in the FIFA regs which would prevent us from making him permanent outside of the window.

Just found this regulation - could they reasonably argue the DE upper is of a higher standard than the BBE lower?? (I don’t think so):

I don’t think the regulation allows for that argument to be made: (edited to add, needs reading in conjunction with the post below it)

I thought you were talking about my ex for a minute.

I think I need to make my sarcasm more obvious.

I’m starting to suspect our medical team is shit.

I think you’re overestimating his intelligence there.

You think that would make them sell?

They could have waited to see how the boycott went before commenting on it.