rigger

Let's hope VI learns from it.

Might not be true, it coincides with the Hack drama.

The second statement seems to say that the club were annoyed about the reporting, also the leaking of team selections. At no point have they said that any of the reports were not true.

The grassy knoll behind the Riverside has turned into a wood.

They probably thought it would never happen, so why have a process in place.

Only if the pundits start telling the truth.

Details of ticket pricing will be announced via the Lancashire Telegraph.

The way I read it, the 40% was given if you bought a ticket for the rearranged game, full face value if you could not attend the rearranged game.

Not pedantic, the truth.

To abandon a game, it must have kicked-off. If it hasn't kicked-off, then it would be postponed.

So what has that got to do with getting the Telegraph to join the coalition ?

Let's hope so

I don't know what you mean ?

No, the item shown, says if the match is abandoned ie it has kicked-off, but you cannot make the rearranged date. Then you are entitled to a full face value refund.

When the criticism gets loud.

I wonder what will happen if you can't make the replay, due to it being held mid-week ?

Get the Telegraph signed up to the coalition.

Get the telegraph signed up to the coalition.

Chaddy ?

They will probably offer 10% off the price of the rearranged match price. But they will make it an A class game.

Not if we beat Charlton.

The Bugle Horn.

The Bugle Horn, at the top of the hill behind the ground, was good the last time I went to Charlton.

I think it is a fair outcome, given that the Rovers where at fault for not fixing a known problem. What I can't understand is allowing people on the panel who abstain from voting. I take it that the three abstainers did so, so that, their vote cannot be used against their clubs, if some action is taken at the end of the season.

Give us three points for the win, then dock us three points for not rectifying a previously known problem.