rigger

We are due one, then.

But your timeline doesn't sound as spectacular.

I have always been a firm supporter of Batty, but something has gone wrong there. He has reached the get rid stage, a shame but that is how football is.

There may or may not be sucking up to the Rovers hierarchy. But that is how it is perceived, because of the way the meetings are reported. Who are the club answerable to, if the supporters groups are not satisfied with the way the club handle the meetings, be that not answering questions or restricting reporting of discussions ?

It all depends on how good the 16 year old is.

Morecambe 1-0 up

So his trick was doing multiple step overs and beating no-one !

What was that one trick, i must have missed it ?

Deceptively slow.

It would have probably improved our attack.

Going on past experiences, longer and disappointing.

At least it would be a plan.

Parker, the day after we slaughter them at the Turd.

There is a typhoon in the South East asia area, I wonder if it might put a spaner in the works of the transfer ?

It will be a surprise if any of it happens !

We need to nip these puns in the bud.

What I took from your answer, is that no juicy questions where asked, so the club are happy not to edit much in the minutes. I may have understood wrongly.

Does that mean no juicy questions where asked, or are the club happy with the minutes because they are giving honest and full answers, to the juicy questions posed ?

From what I can gather from all posts : Steve Waggot was there, some questions were asked, nothing has changed, wait for the (edited) minutes.

I may be wrong here, but isn't it the forums responsibility to report to the fans ?

I think a better way would be, you go and watch them, then tell us who stood out.

And the product is still not worth it, IE not value for money.

And still no 92 club !

rather than speculating for a week.

As an impact sub, maybe.