Whilst Rovers and Swansea have lost our main derby matches there are some new and intriguing ones. Portsmouth v Southampton, Norwich v Ipswich, Birmingham v West Brom, Coventv Leicester, Sheffield United v Sheffield Wednesday and Rovers v Nobbers. That should keep Sky happy.

And on sale from noon tomorrow in store. You can order online from 4 pm today though.

I don't wish to sound uncaring but how on earth is not releasing a list of televised games showing respect. There was quite rightly lots of respect shown to Diogo Jota and his brother yesterday but this is far too extreme in my view.

There was a company in Waterside who made tiles (I'm sure I read they have recently closed) but they certainly aren't synonymous with Rovers or the town. I think it's about the colour of them - all will be revealed at 9 am. 😂

Our third kit is out and available from tomorrow. From the teaser it looks like it could be dark green.

It will be officially known as Diarrhoea Brown if they use it. 😂

I have posted a picture of it on the Premier League thread. Bollocks to decorum and taste - it's that lot. 😂😂

Tragic news about Diogo Jota. Football is insignificant when we hear news like this. My thoughts are with his friends and family. Rest in Peace.

Burnley's new kit featuring a blue and white halved sponsors logo and blue and white collar and cuffs. The peasants will almost certainly be revolting. 😂😂

To be honest he's not on his own in not understand what point you are trying to make.

They might bump into Andy Crawford on Filey beach. Disclaimer: anyone younger than 50 won't understated it 😂

Batth hardly played for Norwich the season before last. Using your logic we shouldn't have signed him and get he turned out to be our best defender and will be a huge miss next season.

It isn't an exact science but he is not on any of the pictures from yesterday's training. I can just make out a small group in the background of a couple of shots. Purely a guess but if he has missed the bulk of per season so far he could be doing individual sessions to get him up to speed.

It emerged in February that Eustace offered to resign in the premier Summer over the slow transfer activity and the lack of support/ambition the club were showing. I really wonder now if Batth and Weimann were appeasement signings done to placate Eustace to prevent him leaving at a crucial time and that Gestede didn't actually want them so in turn low balled the offer made to them both for another season. Quite often there are clauses in older players contracts such as a number of games which automatically trigger another one. It appears nothing of the kind offered to Batth and Weimann. My theory is supported by the latest 'project' as esposed by the three stooges where Rovers are looking to buy/produce youngsters and increase their value to be sold on.

That applies to every player.

Any signing is a gamble, some more than others. Batth was consistently our best defender last season and will undoubtedly improve Derby defensively and leave us weaker.

Then why sign any player?

I don't understand your point.

So some of the ITK's were wrong about Batth by saying the stumbling block was the length of the deal. It wasn't - clearly it is down to wages and it is so disappointing when, after seeing his worth to the team last season that we can't pay more than Derby. Our loss is Derby's gain.

My understanding was that all deals including loans run until the end of June as per contracted players but I can't find anything to substantiate it.

I had around £70k in mind too.

From tomorrow Rovers won't be paying the wages of the out of contract players including loans. How much will they be saving on the wages of Dolan, Batth, Weimann, Woodrow, Beck and Dennis?

Alan Biggs is a well respected, Sheffield based journalist who has had the inside track at Wednesday for ages. It looks like today could be huge for them in terms of their immediate future.

That is exact where I get to when I have the energy to think about them and some supporters theories. Your second paragraph is correct too in my view but I would throw in the word arrogant.