Well, you can get away with one average/poor striker as long as the other one is top class. Try to imagine a forward line with two Mattys' in. We would hardly win a game IMO. That's some kind of gauge of how far Matt has to go yet. That's all.
Yes, you're right, it might sound that way.
Got to point out though, that I was one of those shouting " Oh Matty, Matty. - Matty Matty, Matty, Matty Derbyshire." At full voice.
He will and does get my full support as does every [including Lucas] rovers player.
As for his future - we will see. He has a LONG way to go.
If rovers were to have played every game this season, with two Matty's in attack, we would inevitably have been relegated.
Don't get carried away. Derbs is no where near good enough to start games - yet.
Then you justify that by saying it's because he scored.
By that criteria, Derbyshire shouldn't have appeared because Nonda and Benni should have had 5 games apiece.
You can't just elevate someone because of one tap in. You have to pick your best side don't you?
BTW, apart from the tap in, he did little else - as you will know.
Rover6, two points:
This thread is about the success or otherwise of academies. You're simply arguing for youngsters to be given a chance. What are your views on the academy system?
You mention Gray, Gamst, Mokoena and Traore. Could it just be, although these players have bad days, they are more suited to Prem football than anything else rovers currently have? Yes, even Mokoena, or do you have another name that you can pluck from the list of academy lads?
On SSN, Dunny's saying it's up to Brum if they sell him in Jan. He said he's got 5 months left on his contract and that everyone knows he's a Blackburn fan, - always has been and always will.