I can't include Denmark. In Euro 2020 they lost against Belgium and Finland in their group and went through somewhat fortunately on goal difference by winning one against Russia. They then beat Wales and the Czechs. I was more suprised that having battered Ukraine in the previous round, England made very hard work of beating Denmark in the semi final.

We know. The article tells us that. You initally replied to my post where I said all of the Boxing Day 3pm kick offs being shown live by saying "3pm can't been shown apart from the ones already posted (opening day and last day fixtures)". That's because you thought I was talking about all 3pm kick offs. But because you are incapable of simply saying you misunderstood or you got it wrong, we've now got about 5 posts on this page going back and forward whilst you try and reposition your argument.

Did you even read the article you posted?

PR piece by Jackson there. For example, I guarantee that an EFL game will kick off at 12.30 on Boxing Day. Just because all the 3pm games can be shown live, Sky aren't going to resist having back to back games kicking off at all times through the day. Their advertising revenue during live football will surely be higher than when they have non-live programs on. Plus the argument seems to be "Its not as bad as you think. Last year you didn't get that many 3pm kick offs anyway so getting even less won't be to much worse".

Reading this thread over the last 48 hours, I think we really could do with the first game starting and this tournament getting underway.

If the implication is that Wahlstedt faced so many shots that making mistakes was inevitable then that's rubbish. Against Watford at home they didn't have a shot first half. Second half they made changes, embarrassed our lack of depth and were getting on top, but Wahlstedt hadn't had much to do when two mistakes cost us the game. At Hudderfield over Christmas, their second shot on target went right through him. They had 5 on target in total and we conceded 3. Rotherham at home didn't batter us. We were comfortable but then he came pawing at a corner and conceded. That's 3 different kind of mistakes in a 2 week period that you would expect a competent Championship keeper to be making far less frequently. He's just not a very reliable goalkeeper. It's nothing to do with us being wide open playing like some kamikazi Keegan-esque attacking unit. If Eustace wants to build his team on a solid defensive foundation, I reckon he wouldn't have wanted to put up with LW either. Over a period of time Pears makes less 'normal' mistakes per game, but when he does make one it tends to be a proper howler. (no, he's not really good enough either - just the better of the two)

That happens soooo many times.

This time last year, @goozburger had estimated we had sold 8100 season tickets. You won't hear Rovers social media shouting that stat out. Yes the early bird had just ended, but that means we've around 3000 to sell in 10 days to match last year.

Defensively it’s nowhere near.

Get them to run it again in a fortnight.

Not sure on that. In 2010 we were awful in the group stage, and then got ripped to pieces by Germany in the first knockout game. Lampard should, of course, have equalised but it would have been undeserved.

Clearly a wind up. But if he ever popped up on someone's backroom staff and came to Ewood it would be pretty funny.

Southgate could have cemented his England legacy at 1-0 up against Italy at Wembley in the Euros. Home advantage and IMO a better team and yet we slowly became more conservative. To me he is in the same bracket as Venables, Hoddle, Sven as in he’s given us good tournaments but fallen short. We’ve put inferior Nations to the sword in group games, but there’s no real standout result in a major tournament under GS where you think we’ve put down a marker ( as pleasing as it was, Germany 2001 were not fancied and were in a bit of a transition phase). And that’s a common problem with England. There’s a few games around the end of the 90s we won that were against fancied nations (Netherlands and Spain (Penalties) in 96), Germany (2000), Argentina (2002), but since then I can’t recall winning a game at a major tournament against a team we weren’t obviously favourite to beat either in the group stage or in the knockout. And thats the same under Southgate. For want of a better word, it’s ‘lucky’ he got matched against Ukraine and Denmark in tournaments to get to a final whereby Sven and co came up against very good Brazil, Argentina, Portugal and Germany teams. For me, for Southgate to be regarded ‘better’ that the others, he would need a headline result in a major tournament against a very fancied team, and he hasn’t done that.

Hyam is an OK championship defender, but an absolute bottlejob as a character.

So we did. I didn’t realise the competitions overlapped.

No we weren’t shite in the Nations League before the World Cup. We got 10 points compared to three lately, including that 0-4 humbling off Hungary at home. QF for me and out at the first proper test we have.

We didn’t win a game in the last Nations league. We aren’t winning this.

If we had been open to selling once the transfer window opened in January we would have let it be known, had more interest and drove up a higher price. However if we knew we were selling we also wouldn’t have let Travis go. The court case not being resolved led to a knee-jerk reaction to sell, and Palace were the only club who could move quick enough. We absolutely would have had more interest in the summer and would have had a higher fee. However he wouldn’t be on a plane to Germany next week so I presume he’s now glad he did go.

No. But it was in response to a Nixon article that day. And implies that article is one of many written for clicks. And Blackpool felt strong enough to put that out. But you are right. It could have been Nixons first ever article he has ever written which is inaccurate. Well, other than the war chest and the wee gem ones.

Just a random reminder to when Blackpool FC's official site called Nixon out last year for writing 'many in a long list (of articles) written for the sole purpose of gaining clicks and views, regardless of their accuracy" Interesting Neil Critchley is still manager of Blackpool a full season later.

We are his 8th club in 11 years.

Depends what they are making the difference to. Someone like Docherty is just a championship also-ran and isn't going to push us to to challenging for the play offs. But if we are relying on last years squads and freebies / loans, players like that might be the difference between 21st and 22nd in the league. Don't get me wrong that's depressing but where I see us currently at. I'm normally an advocate that we should only usually be bringing in players better than the starting XI, but the squad is so piss weak that it also needs squad players too. As @Exiled_Rover accurately put in the ST thread "I'm not sitting through another 20+ matches of us being blown away as soon as teams turn to their benches. "

I wouldn't expect the club to do that, so fair play. But if it was me who contacted them in that scenario I wouldnt feel annoyed about it if they said no as I wouldnt expect it. And it is a bit unfair that some people may have stopped going because of cost, whereas other people got free season tickets for emailing in. There's plenty of reasons to dig the club out, and season tickets especially in the riverside should be cheaper, but not sure your example is one of them.

Regardless of who owned the club or in what era this scenario happened, that's how I would expect it to play out.

Who was the last player we signed who had previously played a decent number of games for Burnley? (Say 20+) I’m probably missing someone obvious but can’t think of any. I can think of quite a few going the other way.