Rooney says he wants the Derby job. If he gets it I am pretty certain it would relegate them.

Agree on Cairney. Raya I think with another season could have doubled in price. Certainly wouldn't have depreciated. Also talking about an extra 2 or 3 million, even if solely that, makes a huge difference to Rovers finances, so it's not much of an only in our context.

Not sure this would be a debate if either a) the other defenders were always fit or b) we had adequate cover. As it is neither is the case. Given the 8000 midfielders we have you do wonder why we play it so risky in terms of numbers and questionable fitness in the defence. For example - regardless of ability - Evans isn't massively missed because you have Holtby, Rothwell, Travis, Trybull, Johnson and Downing who can all play there. Bennett too I guess. Whereas defence is much thinner on the ground. Groundhog Day at Rovers though with a cobbled together defence.

Yes especially when we had one in the books who was known to be injury prone. In fact neither of the other two are particularly injury free. Surely that's for the manager to sort out rather than Dom! But knowing that we already had injury tendencies in that area made signing an injury prone player even more risky. That's not rocket science. The more I think on it, missing out on Bauer has cost us. Tosin was better but on higher wages which perhaps could have been used elsewhere and was only a one season benefit. Bauer would have given us a dependable long term option who was often available, which I'm not sure Ayala is. This year I am not as sure, although if we had Bauer it wouldn't be a question we are asking. Missing out on Kipre was a blow, but surely our European scouting network could have found someone of equal ability with a tad more fitness.

All squads can afford to carry an injury prone risk or two. The benefits can outweigh the costs in these situations. What a squad cannot carry is more than a couple of injury prone players. I would suggest we are carrying far too many, which on top of Covid and long term unfortunate injuries is a real killer

Their best is shoddy and poor. Their worst is abusive and criminal. Goodness knows how people can like them or what frame of reference they are using to come to that conclusion. I treat another human like that, say a family member, and they would view things in a very different light. Also have we forgotten - Hughes, Souness even ignoring (though we shouldn't) the years Jack was here and in charge the standards were still high. How can we have forgotten that?

Yes. Maybe storylines are rushed more and as I said before about the character development and turns make little if any sense - that seems to have occurred more since the transition to TV. Strange really as the first few episodes after the move were still good and you wouldn't think the additional time would be that much of a problem. They had and have a roster deep enough to do a 2 hour show. And looking at the current roster it is incredibly deep. So the TV shouldn't have been that much of a negative change.

Watch NXT and NXT UK as well as the PPVs on the network. Whilst I would say unwatchable is overly harsh I would say that it is definitely a mixed bag. NXT is in my view the strongest of the products and still produces some.good and great quality matches. However it's not imo at the level it was a year or two ago. It had a couple of years where it was simply excellent and it has fallen far from those standards, especially in light of character development. People turn from faces to heels and vice versa with little reasoning and in a short space of time which undermines the brand's credibility. The in ring action is still pretty solid but their slow storytelling and character development was a strength so for that to go is a big loss. As for the rest it's a very mixed bag with some gems thrown in. Most PPVs have a few good matches in and a fair whack of cross, NXT UK similar. Can't remember too many good PPVs where I was really invested - a couple of matches at Summer Slam being a notable exception. When it's good the product is very good but when it isn't it is quite bland. Is that better than previous years? Debatable. I thought Drew was a good champion giving good matches. But a lack of crowd doesn't help and must be having a huge impact on the quality of things.

Mirrors my thoughts too. Add in the legacy of Flowers as well and Friedel was up against it when he came. Fair to say I became a big fan. Best Rovers keeper ever. As for our current crop of keepers. TK does well in part simply by coming after Walton. That said, even with that benefit I actually think he is good. It doesn't help that Pears doesn't look convincing - and after Walton also looking none too convincing, that's going to make the defence exceptionally edgy. However, at least the number 1 position is sorted. Hopefully the Greek lad can develop and make the number 2 spot his own too (or Pears improves.)

Yes. There was an article linked on here a while ago about him that was an interesting read. Him and his agent seem in cahoots. The article talked of how Boro were angry (possible legal dispute) over inflated transfer fees that he had arranged, and his agent tried to get himself a job as Head of Recruitment as well when Monk applied for the position of Manager at Brum. The fact he has been sacked from numerous clubs, often with not a bad record on the pitch suggests he is very dodgy and worth steering clear of.

That's my thinking too. He'd one pretty well imo, and if this season hasn't been great, then his previous couple of years have seen certainly seen them punch above their weight. I imagine had he had the backing TM had had, 15 millioin or so, then it could have been what got them that extra bit and into playoffs and possibly the Premiership. Certainly his record is decent, a couple of good seasons with PNE where he perhaps overachieved, a promotion with Norwich. He doesn't strike me as a duffer. The problem is with these smaller clubs punching above their weight, sooner or later they always get found out. First time I remember seeing that is with Coventry back in the Premiership under Strachen, with him having to get a new stirker each year. Sooner or late the magic runs out, and that might be happening to Neil now.

You say that but I am not so sure. Footballers are a funny lot. Bale is good enough to win trophies but was content to sit on the Real bench for a season or two. (appreciate he has moved on now but only after a good stint chilling in the stands.) And there are a number of other examples too. Even Smallwood didn't want to move on and took a wage here rather than playing. Being set up financially seems more of a motivator these days.

Well yes it is a matter of opinions but I still think it's massively optimistic to see that he will make those levels based on what we see. Firstly it's taken 2+ years to get to where he is. so a similar rate of progress suggests another 2 years to get to develop from his level. That's 4 years before getting anywhere near the money we paid. This becomes even more pertinent when we look at his current form which is a bit of a flat track bully. He's good against weaker teams, but poor Vs stronger teams. That doesn't shout out 7 million and suggests there is a fair way to go before developing to a level where he will be. 7 million talents can do it against tougher teams. Thirdly he has only looked good in this formation. That doesn't suggest huge quality and should the formation change due to injuries, personal change or unlikely as it is a new manager, that doesn't suggest he will continue to improve. And this is assuming there are no injuries or life events that impact Beretons development and stall it. Many a player has been transformed by an injury. Lots of its and buts however the evidence suggests that on balance of probabilities there s a long way to go before we get our 7 million back. That said as I have mentioned before I think the 7 million is a dead loss and that the best we can get from Bereton is a useful player. Looking for the 7 million perhaps isn't the most helpful thing in the situation.

Strongly disagree with point 3. Nowhere near that yet. Look it's a massive improvement. It's brilliant that he isn't a liability. But he is nowhere near a 7 million pound player as yet. Those players consistently score goals at this level. Best case scenario is Ben has 1 season of that and even then I'm not too sure how many he will get this year. He's looked great against weaker teams l, anonymous Vs stronger ones. That's not a 7 million pound player. I'm as glad as the next fan that he isn't a waste of a wage anymore but he still has a long way to go before being 7 million of talent. And I'm a tad cautious of looking for this 7 million player too. Imo that was hugely overpriced and perhaps not what success will look like with Ben. It was a huge error to pay that much for him and whilst I would love him to justify his fee I think a rectified situation perhaps looks a bit different to that.

Parker at Fulham strikes me as ond of those in the latter category. Not that good but with a good squad got promotion. Totally different approach to us. We haven't got an outstanding candidate- in the proper sense of the word - in all their recruitment. TM is the best we have had and tbh his record isn't exactly great.

Absolutely. Given we have strengthened in areas we have numbers in (although am not against that because of quality concerns rather than quantity) to not strengthen the defence more is crazy. We didn't rely on the promising Dolan, plus Bereton and Chapman out wide we brought in Elliott. Heck we even brought Downing back! But experienced defenders are at an utter premium at Rovers and we are content to go with the bare minimum and have makeshift full backs from.midfield.

Would agree. He needs to get a bit tougher or a bit smarter, both of which I think could be coached into him. The talent and control he has though can't be taught and makes him well worth holding onto. Think the patience point is key. Given he needs more toughness or smarts, that's not going to come overnight. so it's not a case of switching his position or something simple to make a difference it will take work. But something definitely worth persevering with.

Thoughts on the game: 1) Crucial win. Stops the rot and go into the break on a bit more of a positive trajectory. 2) My word don't our best players make a difference? 3) Armstrong - if he was more clinical he wouldn't be here. Likewise if there were more natural scorers in the team his wastefulness wouldn't be as much an issue. Overall very pleased with his progress and we are a different team with him in the first 11. 4) A defence of youth graduates show we have spent next to nothing/ignored our defence. Sure we had a couple injured but that was the case across the team. I'm not sure whether it is Venkys or TM or a couple of good youth grads covering over the cracks but we seem to have ignored the defence. Contrast with the amount of midfielders we have brought in and you see a heck of a difference. You feel a bit more spent on the defence and we would be a much better prospect. 5) Johnson on his day is one of our most important players. The problem is that inconsistency, injuries and a lack of fitness make this something that cannot be relied upon. Shame because when on form he is a beast. 6) We have too many fair weather players that look good when we are playing well winning but poor when struggling. Bereton seems a prime example of this. That said 6 months ago if you would have said Bereton would turn into a fair weather player rather than a flop then I would have taken it, as that's a big improvement. 7) Today showed why I think I am right about relegation not being an issue. We will beat too many of the weaker teams and pick up points. Not sure we have enough about us for a promotion push but there's enough in there which will get the 1 win in 4 to keep us safe.

And he kept us up with a strike force of post injury Jansen, Dickov, Stead and Boothroyd. If he can do that with them then he might even get a tune out of our strikers.

I think it's probably one of my top two seasons attending too. The other contenders being under Souness promotion season and first year back in the Prem.

The whole of that season was crazy. Like you said we had an amazing start. We hammered champions Arsenal on their patch before they returned the favour to us later on. There were some nutty high scoring games - lost to Leeds 3-4, beat Leicester 5-3. We got into Europe in the last game of the season beating the Barcodes with a thunderbolt free kick from Sutton. Will certainly remember that one for a long time.

There's also the small matter of how we are performing on the pitch! On paper we look to have a good squad and a decent one even with the injuries (see I agree with you on occasions!) But we aren't playing to either of our theoretical ability levels (with or without injuries). It's also worth noting that should we not get in the playoffs as you suggest we should, that won't reflect well on the manager...

Strangely my Dad says the opposite. He wants to go more now he can't. Perhaps because it's a way of spending time together and lockdown has prevented home visits and other ways of doing so. Maybe if watching football matches is permissible as oppose to home visits it could have an effect on maintaining attendance? Agree with the main principle though. When the habit is gone then it's hard to get it back. A lot of other businesses will worry about that too.

Yes. Contrast this with Hughes and how fondly his team is remembered and I think a lot of the difference (outside of competence) is this.

I think so. I think it was the week or two before he had another heck of a shot from the edge of the area but Gally kind of helped it on its way with a back-heal and cause he got a touch it was credited to Gally. So Croft said he wellied the next one into the top corner to ensure he got the credit. Again why do I remember this? I forget milk when the missus asks me to get some yet I remember this.