Warnock (almost came) and promoted with Cardiff. Rowett - doing well with Millwall. Houghton (still not in work and unconvinced he will get a premiership gig and he will soon realise that). That's just off the top of my head. But let's be honest it's a straw man argument. To be better they have to realistically do a few things: 1) not blow the entire transfer budget on 2 utter flops potentially endangering us to FFP 2) have a fairly consistent line up and not play players stupidly out of position. 3) not in the last year have a points per game total that is relegation form, or as poor as Mowbrays (which might just be above it, not done the maths). But in short a better recent record than TM 4) if you want to consider past achievements although there's pros and cons to this (Souness did brilliantly for us for 3 seasons then lost the plot, and feel TM for all his past achievements with us has similarly done so) then have a better record of success than TM. This is a harder criteria especially with upcoming managers so perhaps isn't a great one to use for numerous reasons. On criteria 1-3 I suggest most managers suggested blow TM away. Or put it another way who would want TM as a manager from another club now? It is risky the Lunes appointing but I would suggest they would struggle to do worse than TM who has run his course.

Your welcome and I feel the same. Its a sad indictment that we haven't brought anyone better for the midfield slot in 6 windows then Evans. Thank goodness Evans has made the breakthrough.

Woah tosspots for disagreeing with your post and not rating "Corey"? Seems someone is getting a little overly worked up about this. Seriously - get a grip!! His achievements for Rovers however are more limited and include lots of injuries and imo in a fair number of the games I've seen him play he goes missing and rarely dominates. Better this season but still. Wouldn't disagree with you that we haven't recruited better. Johnson is no better and we really should have brought better than Evans. Smallwood was better suited in league 1 to the scrap but in a more sophisticated league is out of his depth so yeah we should have brought better. However that doesn't make Evans a good player - just TM not great at signing players. Shame we can't disagree without resorting to insults.

Lucky? At best his medicore championship midfielder. More often he is an injury prone midfielder who hides and only plays well when there's internationals coming up or his contract needs renewing. He's had a decent season, probay his best under us despite that not being a particularly high bar, but lucky to have him is a massive overhyping of his abilities.

Yes, I don't think we're going down this season as even WLLLL will comfortably keep us up this year. That said it's poor form and shows we're nowhere near playoff candidates under TM.

TM usually wins these kinds of games (better opposition where little is expected). Gally out wide is an absolute waste. Whilst it is debatable as to his merits as a striker fans and critics alike think it's stupid playing him there and yet the only person in the world who thinks it is a good idea is the one who picks the team. Don't buy unlucky with injuries either. Of we had another centre back of decent quality Tosin could fill in there admirably. Or possibly if we had better midfielders Travis could drop back (though.ore reluctant on this as he is our best centre mid...) When you only have a few defenders on the books it is going to cost you. The point and drab draws in our non-winning means we're not going to get sucked into a relegation battle. And Preston can't gloat about beating us twice which is a bonus. Crumbs of consolation but that is what we are reduced to.

Ah but be fair rigger. We don't always know how he will make it more difficult. TM keeps us all guessing on that one.

Given Armstrong has been our best player of late and is best wide right this seems an ominous statement that TM is going to make things harder than they should be...

Not sure Holtby did and there rest were all summer acquisitions. Say you are correct though, why the heck did he say it. Either he's lying and of poor moral character or tactically inept. Either way it is not an encouraging sign. P

Hmm no one told that to Souness when he signed Cole, or Hughes when he signed Nelson, Savage and Mokoena. Its a lie he peddles to keep his team happy. None of the top managers think like this.

I think we did it a couple of other times in league 1 and struggled and also last year but had to change formation sharpish because we were struggling. We've also struggles with other formations that TM has experimented with on occasions too, especially early on in league 1. Not trying to slate your formation, it has a number of merits as well as drawbacks, but am uneasy given our past history of how we've struggled to adapt to new formations.

Even if Armstrong does step up - which I agree is a very tall ask and unlikely - whose going to replace his goals as the second scorer? Not as big a challenge as replacing Dack's goals but given Armstrong has double what anyone else has there still has to be a step up into the second top scorer's role and that's still a big ask for our team. Armstrong has 7 goals (I think) and can't see any of our players getting 7 goals in half a season. I can't even think of a couple who will likely get 5 in a half season to alleviate this problem. (maybe Graham if he plays more but his best link up is with Dack...) Goals are a problem whatever way you look at it. Incidentally part of the reason Armstrong is looking a decent player is the fee we paid for him. His performances for a 2-3 mill player are decent / good. Had we spent 5 or 7 million on him it would be a different story. As it is, this is beginning to look like a good move from TM.

Impressive stars. A level below but still. Seems like he could make an impact.

2 years ago this was a really tough award to give. Graham, Dack, Mulgrew and Smallwood (yes really!) we're all contenders, perhaps Bennett too. This year other than Downing which player has performed consistently well and is in with a shout or argument for the position. Shows how badly we are doing.

Play Offs is unrealistic unless we have an amazing window and get in 4 top class players - a striker, keeper, centre back and left back. A few reasons why: - We're missing Dack, our best player, and top scorer, who also creates a fair few goals too. - No one else looks likely to step up and increase their goal tally to replace Dack's lost goals. In fact step up is a bit misleading, get a big ladder and climb would be more appropriate, as Armstrong aside Dack has triple the number of goals any of the other players have. That would mean a couple of players would have to double their goals, or someone triple their goals, which is highly doubtful. You could argue Armstrong will become our pinch hitter, and replace Dack's goals, but even in that unlikely case - he has blown hot and cold since we brought him - we'd still need a player or two to double their goals to replace Armstrong's contribution as the second scorer. Again, this is unlikely. - Squad wise we have a threadbare defence with poor reserve defenders - Bell, Williams, Bennett. When injuries invariably occur, we don't have the quantity or quality to compete and maintain a strong level of ability. - We have a keeper who has dropped a number of clangers costing us points. Even if this continues at the same rate, it'll mean a fair few points dropped. - TM constantly plays players out of position and rotates the team, weakening cohesion and limiting players. He has shown no indication of stopping this unless the pressure is very high, and so will in all probability continue to do this costing us points. - Our form over 2019 was generally poor and we didn't over the course of the year get anywhere near enough points for playoffs. Even just taking this season we're not in the playoffs having had two poor runs already. The odds of another one or two costing us a fair number of points are very likely, when we consider this season and last. - Finally we are outside the playoffs half a season in, meaning that we have to improve in order to get into them. What are the chances of that? Do we realistically look like we are improving? Are many of the players? All in all, I can't see any reason to be optimistic unless TM is potted and we bring in players in the 4 above mentioned positions who are actually of a good standard, which isn't going to happen.

An interesting formation, negating some weaknesses and getting our better players in the team. Whilst it seems to have some merits we haven't done well with new formations which makes me worry about how we would do with it. Previous attempts of 3 at the back haven't gone well at all. Its not a long term solution with only 3 centre backs in the squad. Worry a bit too that Travis and Johnson would get outnumbered. That said it avoids the likes of Bereton z Bell and Bennett near the team which can only be good things. It also could see us get the best out of Downing- not a natural left back - and allows Tosin to push forward and use his composure on the ball more. No idea how this game will turn our (how's that for a prediction?) On form and paper we should lose but very often these games are ones we unexpectedly win. That said not being clear favourites whilst playing Preston is a rather shameful situation and a sign of our issues irrespective of the result.

This winger sounds positive but it's not one of the positions we need to get sorted. Keeper, a threadbare defence and a decent striker are all much bigger priorities. Also shows TM is hopelessly stuck in a rut when scouting for players and the European scout network needn't exist as we only sign players he knows. Its how we've got stuck with so much dross. So like the link but as with many TM things am worried (terrified) of the methodology behind it.

I posted earlier in the thread that imo we are desperate for 4 players - keeper, left back, centre back and striker. If selling Evans allows us to address more ot these huge needs I feel it is a sacrifice we need to make. Add in he's had a lot of injuries and poor spells in his time here, and the fact that Johnson and Bennett can do a decent job in the middle, not dissimilar to Evans, then I think it is a fairly low risk worthwhile trade off. Even should Evans come back into the team I feel with improvements in the other positions mentioned will mean that overall we are in a better position as a team.

There is so much to do on this squad it is untrue. Keeper situation - Walton isn't good enough but is miles better than the reserve keeper. Even on our good run this was identified as a place that needed improvement. Think January is the hardest time to recruit a keeper as most are on loan by now who are surplus to requirements. Defence - depth and quality. Our only decent left back is a converted midfielder so this needs sorting asap. For all the "like a new signing" cliche Downing being released from covering left back would massively improve our midfield options and balance. (As an aside in Bell and Williams is there any team with 2 more abject left backs in the division?) All the other positions do have decent quality - Nayambe, Tosin and Lenihen -but all seem to miss huge amounts of games. Even if they were all regularly fit a hard nut centre back would give us lots more options tactically, but given the injuries the trio sustain a centre half is also a must imo. Tosin can switch between CB and cover for RB as required. As it is an injury to any one of these 3 and the quality downgrade is so appalling it's like swapping a car for a bike. Midfield - glut of them and many of them can do a job. Bennett, Johnson, Armstrong, Evans, Rothwell, Holtby are all ok/solid/have potential to be doing better than they are and with so many other areas needing strengthening this really isn't a priority. If we can get all of these players, heck half of these players, playing at the top of their game (which we have seen glimpses of, albeit infrequently) then we have a very strong midfield. Certainly no need to spend money here. Strikers - when the conversation is who is least worst Bereton or Gally you know you have problems. We need to replace Dack's goals and neither of these guys, nor Graham, look like they will do it. Ergo a striker is a must. Clean sheets mean you don't need to score many but we do need some goals and only Dack reliably scores them. We're high on quantity low on quality so would ship a couple out on loan and get in someone else who knows where the net is. Keep Graham too as he is the only reliable one in there but get the rest out on loan where one of them may develop into a decent player. So imo we need 4 players in January - striker, centre back, keeper and left back. Given we do well to get 2 in during January that means we are likely to end up with half of what we actually need! TM is tied to Bereton and Gally doing well so cannot see us getting a striker. In fact the only one I can see him getting is a left back for Cunningham replacement. I'll be honest if we only do have the budget for 2, and 4 signings is a lot for any club in January, much less a non functional one like ours, then I have no idea which to prioritise as they are all desperately needed.

Yes, I said I thought Gally was redeemable but Bereton wasn't mainly because I think his work ethic and getting chances are attributes that I've seen, whereas haven't seen any positives or attributes so to speak from what I've seen of Bereton. However, as you graciously say, who knows - who knows how much of Bereton's issues are mental and confidence issues arising from mismanagement? I totally agree that Bereton's progress is being kiboshed by limited time often out of position. As you say TM is quick to lament Gally's development but it's not a model of progression that we are seeing with Bereton. Even stranger that he does it. However we all know what TM says and does don't always match up and can be a PR exercise only. One last factor to consider hindering both strikers is each other! We have 2 poor strikers needing game time and often only 1 can come in for Graham. And when playing together it can't help the other having such a limited strike partner. Having 2 duds compounds our problems. As you say it's about opinions (agree about Rochina btw) but for me if I had to back one of them it would be Gally. That said it's a rum do when you're debate centres on which expensive signing might not be a complete flop!

Wrong again. Let's go through your comments: Straw man argument - we signed some good players so it's ok Gally and Bereton didn't work out. Because it's about overall transfer budget. That's like saying I brought a run down house at great expense nowhere worth the price I paid but that's ok because I got a great deal on the washing machine... Being under 23 isn't an excuse for them being terrible. Also we brought to try replacing Graham and neither are near that standard. We pay that much money for players who will improve the team. Neither of them are currently and it looks like neither of them will in the immediate future. In Beretons case i"d say ever and their performances back this up. Regardless we don't have masses of funds and we needed to strengthen the squad now - neither has really done that. If you're argument is that they may come good so it's ok to spend that money - my question would be what about the here and now? What about strengthening the team now orthe places we are weak in? Words fail me if you think Bereton in particular is a good use of £7 million. Re Bristol game - look at the post march thread. Finally the injuries aren't TMs fault (although Lenihens were to be expected after the last few years) but not having adequate cover or quality in is. All teams get injuries yet we seem short on numbers and quality to replace injuries. Dack I grant you is a one off special talent but for the rest - injuries are part and parcel of the game and not being ready for them is TMs fault. But if we're honest if you really think I was saying the injuries were his fault you're not reading posts properly and trying to deflect from the real criticisms because they show TM to be limited.

What surprises me about it was that TM saw through Steele very quickly and got shot of him. Walton is of similar ability and less said about our reserve the better. Given his impatience with Raya too you do wonder how Leut is still here and how we can settle for Walton as our number 1. Shambles.

TMs comments aren't going to help matters much whatsoever. Confidence, working relationship- it's going to be even harder for Gally to get it right. The positives - limited as they are when you have wasted 5 million - are a) he works hard and b) he is at least getting into positions. That is a gazillion times better than Bereton and suggests to me there could be a player of some sort in there. Given Bereton is irredeemable, I feel we need to persevere with Gally, although an impact sub may for now be his best role. He's clearly not good enough but I do wonder if there's enough raw materials in there to keep persevering with to find a player. I would be interested to see how he does with a better manager. Raya improved with a decent coaching set up. Perhaps if TM goes a better manager could get something out of him.

You clearly miss the point on both counts Harry. Starting with the money. Not every bit of money works out. No, and i'm not expecting that. And Downing was inspired business. But that's a straw man argument isn't it that not every bit of money/signing works out. The vast majority of our budget went into those two players and they've failed miserably. You are ignoring the overwhelming bad use of the majority of our money for reasons I'm unsure about. Yes, there's been the odd good signing and a couple of inspired but most have been poor, especially when spending the big money. This season for example how many have been a raging success? Downing and Tosin - that's a poor return. But I'm drifting into your straw man arguments here - the bulk of our transfer budget went on Gally who has failed, just like with Bereton. As for your first point yes Bristol worked out well - and if you look back TM was praised highly for it. However how many times does it not work? How many needless changes has there been? How many times has rotation caught us out? How many times have players been in random positions? For every enforced change there seems to have been several unenforced ones. Also if you are saying the players who come in for injuries aren't good enough or we don't have enough cover - whose fault is that. Let's be realistic, it can be dressed up and circumstances can be bleated about but many of our issues fall on TM for poor selection and recruitment issues.

One last comment on the second goal. When I watched it the first time I had to go back because I was convinced I'd missed something it was that bad a missed save. It seemed to go right through him. I know Walton is bad but he can actually save the ball amidst the clangers. Today's keeper might as well not have been there.