Jump to content

BRFCS

BY THE FANS, FOR THE FANS, SINCE 1996
Proudly partnered with TheTerraceStore.com

JHRover

Members
  • Posts

    13861
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    208

Everything posted by JHRover

  1. I'm pretty sure he has been moved along the row so he is now sat directly next to the curtain twitcher. In previous photos and footage he is sat much further away. It occurred to me that this might be deliberate and an attempt to portray a 'united front' and a more comprehensive image of 'the board'. Heaven knows what goes through Coar's head and why he has willingly gone along with this regime for 15 years allowing his name to be carried along with it. I can only assume that he's happy with the ownership and fellow board members.
  2. So after Derby, Stoke, Portsmouth and Cardiff all being handed a 3 point boost by Rovers in their survival bids next up it is Luton's turn to cash in their bonus. A tough place at the best of times, a must-win game for them, a dead-rubber for Rovers, and a dismal record against those down in the bottom third, I can't see any other outcome than a comfortable win for them.
  3. A significant drop off from the 'usual' numbers for a midweek game. Blackburn End very empty as I'd suggest over 1000 vote with their feet. Suppose the club might point to school holidays etc. But if those people aren't turning up on a nice evening for a game they've already paid for then alarm bells should be ringing. But all this lot will worry about is what increase to impose in May to make up the shortfall. An added picture of the filth covered Venky signs on the Riverside. A perfect representation of their ownership.
  4. Perhaps yes, I was thinking along the lines of they had his wages earmarked for cuts and they made damn well sure he was moved out of here regardless of what manager or player wanted. I think Eustace would have liked to have kept him and the player himself would have preferred to stay until the summer and suspect all manner of dirty business was taking place to make sure that didn't happen and probably contributed to Eustace's departure soon after. These weird and suspicious things keep on happening at Venky Rovers usually around the back end of transfer windows.
  5. I suspect one day we will get the truth of what happened with him and his departure and it won't paint the club in a good light whatsoever.
  6. Ismael's average tenure in the last decade has been 26 games (or thereabouts). By the time we get to the summer he will be half way through that here. Unless something remarkable happens in the next 6 games his points return is going to be somewhere between rubbish and barely believably bad levels. What sort of crackpot organisation would then hand him cash and opportunity in the summer to 'overhaul' the squad when in all probability - due to his track record and results to date - he won't be here for much longer?
  7. Do I remember correctly that Waggott mentioned arranging a fixture against Queens Park FC? I'm sure he mentioned doing something with Darwen FC and someone else. I bet none actually happen, just came up with something to make it sound like he's doing something.
  8. Even if Eustace's primary motivation in moving was money, which I don't believe but I suppose it could be true, I'd like to know why it is that a club that was in administration only a couple of years ago, a club that was in League One last season, a club owned by a local non-billionaire, a club we were warned we would 'end up' like if Venkys left, a club up to their necks in relegation trouble 'not knowing what league they are going to be in next season' could offer our manager more than we were paying him. And even if they could, and our wage offering was being comfortably beaten by Derby's offer, why none of the owners, representatives, Waggott thought it was appropriate, or necessary, to immediately and urgently offer him an improved deal bettering that of Derby in an attempt to keep him here. Of course the short termism at this club comes back to bite it in the arse in spectacular fashion. I don't expect Eustace's demands were unreasonable - clarity on the future, new contracts for his key players, maybe an improved/extended deal for himself, a plan for the summer, some sort of backing. Presumably the regime thought themselves clever denying him this, and some satisfaction was felt as the money from Derby cleared into the accounts, but of course in saving themselves time, effort and money here the medium to long term is going to go tits up big time. So far, in the space of a couple of months, they've chucked away another play-off push, when even mediocre form since February would have kept us right in the mix, they've caused a rebellion in the fanbase and this has forced the curtain twitcher and other stooges out into the open, those interviews have confirmed the suspicion for everyone to see that these three are totally untrustworthy and out of their depth running this club, their latest lame duck manager is overseeing an epic collapse in performances and results which shows no sign of stopping, if it carries on like this then our Championship status will be in major jeopardy by September, ticket sales are going to collapse, and those players we do want to stick around in the summer and beyond I would expect are getting their agents to work on getting the hell out of here. So hats off to them. For what required a few reasonable demands to be met for Eustace they've ushered in a catastrophe that is going to take some turning around. So unnecessary, it would have been so easy just to improve Eustace's deal and address his reasonable concerns. Now that chaos has been chosen by the regime they've got to live with the consequences - and it is going to cost them dearly both in terms of plummeting ticket sales and pressure on their positions.
  9. If what has been claimed about Lowe is true, that he is unmovable due to being the owners inside man, and I believe it is true, then I'd rather be was nowhere near running the first team. I think JDT and Eustace felt the same which is why he was shifted out of the way and possibly one reason why neither of them lasted too long.
  10. This side of things interests me. Why has he suddenly, after all these years, assumed a public persona? We know that he has been heavily involved since at least 2015. In a decade since there have been no interviews, a couple of photos of him sat next to Waggott and that's it. Now all of a sudden he's volunteering to do hour long sit down interviews and he's apparently overseeing the commercial operation. It's just a very odd recent shift in his approach. It also doesn't make much sense to me that he's now seemingly tasked with overseeing operations and commercial activity and 'reports' to Waggott on this yet continues in his other role as Venky representative/communicator. I always assumed that his anonymity and silence in the shadows was enforced by the owners, because they didn't want one of their gang being exposed and publicly scrutinised after their experiences back at the start of their ownership. Then with this I ask myself whether it was all his decision to remain silent and run things from the shadows, and he has chosen now to be the time to emerge. Why now? We've technically been in worse situations during his time - relegation to League One, League One, a very close relegation battle last season. No appearance or comment from shadow man. I'm linking his emergence to his new job title as 'COO' which has only happened in the last year. I am however convinced that he is the biggest issue in the corridors of Ewood - far bigger than Waggott or Gestede - and I am also of the belief that it is he who has ensured there is no link between manager and India. I remember Broughton and JDT wanting to go out to see the Indians but it was scuppered by someone - I think he enjoys being the only point of contact to India - but nonetheless the Indians are the root of all this. They have to go and the regime collapses quickly at Ewood.
  11. We might 'do a Derby' Not sure that sounds too bad these days.
  12. I suppose there will probably be a few thousand of their supporters but other than that this could be the lowest home league attendance in many a year.
  13. The name of the game for Waggott and Suhail is to keep their own gravy train rides going with minimal aggro/hassle/attention on them whilst meeting their 'targets' i.e. getting people buying tickets. Much of what has gone on over the years is about deluding the fans into thinking there is a plan, strategy, future, ambition. There isn't, most are realising that now, but the art of the con is to keep people focused on whichever fall guys they have installed - Mowbray, Venus, Broughton, JDT, Eustace, Park, Owen, Gestede etc. These people are effectively used by the two stooges as human shields to handle the fans, players and media whilst the two stooges go about doing whatever it is they are tasked with doing by the owners. They've got away with it since Mowbray went - they were lucky in the first place with him because he handled all the press etc. and his journey to nowhere kept people distracted. When he left the trouble started more because they needed someone to fill that void whilst putting up with the Venky nonsense - not easy. Broughton and JDT gave up on it quickly after realising the truth, as did Eustace and Park. They have got themselves into a real tight corner now with Ismael because results and performances are both consistently atrocious. They've tried diverting attention onto next season and the fabled 'rebuild' which we all know by now is just another opportunity to slash the wage bill and sell a few more assets, but the problem they have is that we are 6 games into Ismael with another 6 to come and results are unrelentingly bad, almost unheard of for a new manager walking into a top 6 side. Ordinarily I'd say zero chance of this guy getting sacked any time soon, but part of me thinks that with the way results are and the direction things are going with the fans, and most importantly the heat and focus on the boardroom, these two stooges will not be able to cope with it and would do anything to turn the attention away from them and India. We saw it with JDT's departure - the minute he turned the media focus onto the shadow man and India he was out - they don't like it - and won't like what is happening right now and will know if results continue like this it will only get worse. They're deluded enough to think that a managerial change will provide a sideshow to divert attention away from the other stuff. In some cases they will be right.
  14. The end goal is to be rid of them and then hopefully get an ownership and executive that runs the club properly. This is something that all the money in the world does not make up for. We are not consistently losing £20 million a year. Off the top of my head we have done so a handful of times. Usually it is several million less than that and the last few years will be nowhere near that thanks to player sales. Whatever the owners have put in over the last couple of years must be minimal when taking into account what they've brought in from sales. We are also forgetting that promotion to the Premier League is the reason an investor would get into this and if achieved more than makes up for several years of funding Championship losses. We go into League One, which is a matter of time under this 'model' of management, the pool of potential buyers dries up considerably. I can just see it now - the naysayers and those who have for some unknown reason convinced themselves that 'nobody would buy us' despite all available evidence suggesting that in all probability there would be interest - will watch us slide into the lower leagues under Venkys, shrivel up into a husk of a 3rd or 4th division club and then eventually far less people would be interested in buying so 'point proven'. They are not owed £140 million. That is their tab for the last 15 years. Their bill that they have allowed to rack up. A competent engaged owner would not need to find £20 million a year. Far less than that if they improve commercial and ticketing/income and manage player trading better rather than running our assets out of contract. Does such a person exist? Birmingham, Huddersfield, Wrexham, Hull, West Brom all say 'hi'. The way out of this is that the owners go, and then we take it from there on the long road to recovery. It might not be quick or easy but ultimately is necessary for the long term health of the club.
  15. I don't think so. He will be 23 at the start of next season and his only real experience has been loans at Bolton in League One, Dundee in the SPL and Rovers in the Championship. He is getting another Championship club at best. I can't see very many paying more than £3 million for a Championship LB. If we were a sensible club with any sort of strategy or investment then he'd be top of the list for an offer, but we saw with Harrison Reed that we've no interest in making these players permanent and prefer to put them in the shop window so that a rival club can move in and buy them the year after. I suspect he will end up at a Middlesbrough, Stoke, West Brom etc. I suppose we will see on that.
  16. Beck will sign for a Championship club for £2 million or so at the most.
  17. It's just nonsense in our position anyway. If we were stuck at the bottom fair enough I'd understand some caution on renewals if there was a serious threat of League One (although if we were serious about bouncing back like we were last time you'd still want a squad under contract for that battle)> But if looking upwards at the PL you take the hit on a new contract from a position of strength. I'm not sure what the downside is - we get promoted, hit the jackpot in which case the money laid out on a handful of Championship players is nothing in the scheme of things. They're just making excuses and they know that a large chunk of the fanbase will just accept it. The Venkygraph have been busy today, knowingly or not, doing the clubs propaganda work for them. Hailing the Ribeiro deal as 'first new contract in 16 months' but that 5 month initial contract was always ridiculous to begin with and still banging the Dolan drum as though the club has made a decent offer or tried hard to keep him. There's no evidence of that other than the claims of an untrustworthy group of people who are keen to protect themselves.
  18. This lot will force Trav, Tonstad and Brittain out the door by failing to even discuss new terms until it is too late and then try to beat them in a game of brinkmanship and then turn around and expect praise for 'only' paying £20k a week towards Dennis' Forest salary. Then when those players inevitably leave to secure proper Championship wages and deals our lot will scratch around until deadline day and eventually capitulate and agree to pay someone else even more. They just make it up on a whim and it will destroy us.
  19. So we CAN offer and extend contracts 'without knowing what league we are going to be in next season'? In which case why aren't they sorting out the really important ones - Travis, Tronstad, Brittain etc..?
  20. There is a difference between the owners being permitted to send monies that ensure the club meets its outgoings, wages, tax obligations, without which there is a very real prospect of the club going bust/into administration, and the owners being permitted to send additional unnecessary monies for non-essential things such as new players. It is understandable why they would get the permission of the Court to send the former, as it is essential funding without which all manner of potential problems develop including unpaid tax and wages and probable redundancies. Lots of problems and questions for people to deal with. A different matter altogether when the money being transferred is a few million to allow someone to go and buy a few new players and in doing so increase costs. So whilst technically they may be correct - there is no problem with the owners transferring funds to cover liabilities and stop the club going bust - it may also be correct that there is a problem with them getting permission to send funds over to splash out in the transfer window or make improvements/increases to costs.
  21. Derby now 2-0 up on Preston, On track for 4 straight wins. Quite ironic that run started with them beating us and we've just lost 4 on the bounce.
  22. Waggott also claimed that his contract was direct with the ownership group. That can't be correct, if he is an employee and director of BRFC then his contract of employment must be with BRFC as the club pays his wages.
  23. The ONLY concern of those appointing a new manager in February should have been finding a bloke who could extract 100% from this squad over 12 games. No more, no less. The summer should not have even been considered. Our last realistic shot at promotion to the Premier League thrown away due to fancy modern speak about recruitment, styles, etc.
  24. I also find it really weird how Suhail is then questioned on retail and Ewood Park issues like season tickets, the Riverside, club shop, prices. They've admitted that he is more involved in the commercial side of things. It's just very strange, he admits to being involved with the purchase of the club by Venkys back in 2010, he admits to have been hands on at the club since 2015, and now a decade on he finally offers himself up in public but much of his topic of discussion is about what I would describe as fairly trivial matters in the grand scheme of things. On the one hand he's obviously the owners' man, representative and despite his claims I suspect the only one with a direct line to India, and is clearly trusted by them having been involved for well over a decade, yet we are now supposed to believe after all this time he is spending his days attempting to improve the Ewood Park atmosphere and worrying about kits and ticket prices and he's reporting to Waggott on such things? Nonsense IMO.
  25. Waggott tied himself in knots with the Eustace departure and fair play to Andy Bayes for forcing that out of him. He came out with the ludicrous claim that the move occurred because Eustace had played for Derby and that it is 'closer to his house'. Eustace himself has said this wasn't a factor and nor is it very often in the world of professional football - you don't base your managerial career about being nearer to home or you don't get very far in the game. He then conceded that there had been an approach from Derby on the Friday and that from that moment Eustace was in the 'departure lounge' essentially that his mind was elsewhere and not on the job at Rovers. Then when asked why Eustace was allowed to remain in the dugout for the Wolves FA Cup game 2 days later, to which he responded that Eustace had done all the preparation that week and that because he hadn't joined Derby there was still a chance it might not happen. He whines about how difficult it is mid-season to recruit managers or even assistants employed at other clubs, overlooking the fact that this is precisely what happened here and the reason why we needed a new manager. Sometimes I can't work out whether he actually believes some of the stuff he comes out with, and doesn't think what goes on here is unusual, as he does put on a pretty convincing display in suggesting that all is normal and part and parcel at Ewood, or whether it is a very well crafted performance designed to try and convince viewers that the events of the last few years here are just normal. He also indicated that news would come out about a couple of new contracts for players in the next couple of days. So I am looking forward to seeing who those are before the end of the week. I think we all know by now that this is highly unlikely to happen and at best it will be a couple of the academy lads or U21s getting improved terms. I will be amazed, astonished, if any of the current senior team are announced as having signed new extended terms before the weekend. He can't help himself.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.