Jump to content

BRFCS

BY THE FANS, FOR THE FANS
SINCE 1996
Proudly partnered with TheTerraceStore.com

MarkBRFC

Members
  • Posts

    4689
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    9

Posts posted by MarkBRFC

  1. 4 minutes ago, arbitro said:

    There are lots of good young coaches in current employment but we won't get any of them. I don't think we have appointed a manager who was in work and had to pay compensation, it's a bit like exploiting the free transfer market. That narrows it down a bit.

    I think, but might be wrong, that we paid to get Appleton from Blackpool all those years ago for some reason.

  2. 21 minutes ago, jim mk2 said:

     

    Agree. It's a daft idea to target the Newcastle game. They're a deluded lot who think they support the biggest club in the world. They look down on us like they do most clubs and we won't get any sympathy from them let alone support

    Don't think its a bad idea at all to target the Newcastle game, we probably won't have another game as high profile all season.

    Just not sure getting there fanbase on board will work.

    • Like 1
  3. 1 hour ago, Dreams of 1995 said:

    I think the Newcastle game is a very good one to target

    If people could make contact with the Newcastle Supporter Group I reckon they would be on side too. They have had their fair share of problems with owners...although not quite on this scale

    I dont think Newcastle supporter groups are interested in that sort of thing, now there club is sorted they laugh at clubs like us.

    They had 3000 leaflets printed taking the piss out of Everton when they played at Goodison recently.

    • Like 2
  4. 14 minutes ago, Tugayisgod said:

    Ths deal says there is a big loan fee involved plus if we do decide to take up the option to sign him it will cost more than the £2.3m we were due to pay

    Classic venkys.

    The loan fee will be a lot less than the 2.3m, and despite the obvious spin there will be no intention of making it a permanent deal.

    • Like 2
  5. 59 minutes ago, Darwen Rover 007 said:

    I think we need a few players in yes 100%... 

    But..

    Just a  thought on not going mad today / tomorrow and becoming desperate because:

    1.  We have some players coming back.

    2.  We get a stop gap (the old guy).

    3.  Unless we go really pete tongue it's unlikely we are going to get relegated or push for play offs.

    We may as well take a sensible approach (I know) and recruit properly in the summer.  We all know January desperation moves often don't work out.

    Just a thought..  

    Would love to know what you have seen in the last 13 years to think this is a possibility.

  6. Just now, Realistic Rover said:

    Seems strange for us to let him go without a bidding war that will no doubt happen in the summer. 
     

    We in no rush to sell (4.5 year deal) so it’s strange to let him go at the first bidder.

    CPFC is not a great move for him stylistically. Roy doesn’t play football, they bypass midfield, and will probably mis-profile him as a 10, as he’s ’good on the ball’.

    Think his dad and agent have Mis advised him if he ends up there 

    Unfortunately we have bills to pay thanks to our illustrious owners.

    However it's dressed up, that is the reason why it is being rushed through in this window.

    • Like 7
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.