chaddyrovers

Brilliant watch

Granted. But if you wage bill 20m for the season that's £384k a week.

Have they found new owners?.

Thanks for the reply

Its something I acknowledge weeks/months ago. I just don't fixated on the issue. Players move on and new players come in. We cant match what players want. We have a wage budget and we are sticking to it. Should we pay more than what we can afford, it that right approach. If you pay one 25k then others we demand the same then you are going to be over your budget. Then your squad players will demand more for their role in the team. RF99 complaints that players are taking all the money out of the game then wants us to pay more than our budget is. Massive conflict there Don't you agree?

What deal with Adidas and Gary Aspden?

made more than enough comments over the contract situations over certain players but I know which players have signed new contracts and haven't.

Yes I know what I said thanks but I also that Dolan wasn't ever going to say and that was 19 months when GB tried to get him to sign a new contract and was stonewall I never said players were greedy did I? yet again, making up points to suit your own opinion. two great head coaches? abit over the top here with the word great? Great managers of Rovers are former managers like Sir Kenny Dalglish or Graeme Souness or Mark Hughes not John Eustace or JDT a division we were have been in the playoff hunt in the 3 seasons out of 4. I would suggested Rev, that you actually look at what I have posted about that, cos I have said something has clearly happened behind the scenes since the players came back from pre season, something I said repeatably which is what I said last week Rev and over the weekend

do you think I don't already know this??? you are obsess and fixation on this issue. Dolan was never signing a new contract here.

Its 3 players who have left this summer. Dolan was always going. We have recoup around 9/10 million pounds for those 3 players. So if I making making assumptions on wage demands then surely it yourself blaming Rovers and totally and utter resolving the players or agents off any blame So its quite clear we have a limit on what we will pay and we won't pay above that. you complain about us not paying enough then in other topic you complain about players taking all the money out of game and fans being ignored I'm not the one who complained about Ismael answering the question directly and proper instead of not. He did that with the Brittain situation and he was the Travis situation. He is straight to the point and doesn't sugar coated situation. Pears situation? what is the situation? please tell us all full defence of what? I have said Rovers were wrong to sell Hyam so late and without any form of proper replacement. Had Rovers sold Hyam and then brought in a replacement like Callum Chambers or Mattie Pollock then none of this would be a debate

on the type of loans for promising players, how much playing time they get and we avoid the situation like last year we witness with Jake Garrett who had 2 disastrous loan moves

that what rumours says Travis wanted wage wise? for whatever reasons we couldn't agree new contract cos they demands are too high for our wage budget, so I will ask this very simple question, should Rovers have broken their wage budget to get a Travis or Brittain to get a new contract? Well you said Ismael throw Travis under the bus cos he told the supporters that he wanted out. still stand by that opinion?

I know what we received Rev. The transfer budget was £5m as said during the Fans Forum minutes yet we spent more and another £5m so did reinvest some money from sales. I have already discussed the Hyam situation and the lack of replacement. did you my posts?

I'm not twisting anything, I used what we know and we know the transfer budget was £5m and we spend near double that around £10m

We couldn't agree new contracts with certain players but if we can't match their demands then we have to sell them. So we should break our wage budget to keep them then? So we should pay 30k a week if that is what they demand? yet you have no patience to wait and see what the actual situation is, cos you are already judging the player. We want a more box to box midfielder next to Tronstad now which is very different to the way we were playing last season. Yes we will miss All 6 in some ways, others more than others but Rovers must carry on.

The original transfer budget was £5m as per the Rovers fans forum minutes. Yet we reinvested around 4-5m on top of them from players sales. I said last week Rev this very point.

But he also said later in the summer that they had overhaul the squad more than he wanted but the contract situation meant we sold certain players and bought in signings. Yes none stayed but Travis, Brittain and Hyam we received around £8m for them which some of that money was reinvested in the squad from the original £5m budget. if we couldn't agree new contracts then do we let them leave for free which I thought you were against that. Their demands are much higher than we can afford Wrexham were targeted a another centre back and looking to pay £2.5m for that player. Rovers decided to take that money which I wouldn't unless you had a proper centre back replacement lined up to come in 2 loans to buy. Baradji loan to buy is a smart move by Rovers, if he plays and perform well enough we sign him.

no point being over judgemental until we know what the specialist has said, exactly why Rovers did the loan to buy agreement? I take you aren't in favour of us doing this.

my opinion He said other comments about the Rovers were making more of overhaul then we were expecting. Hyam shouldn't have been sold so late in the window and even more so without a proper replacement in. Shrouded in mystery? how? over his injury? Hasn't he gone to see a specialist over the international break? sure I read that somewhere Ismael and Gestede were big fan of him and wanted him all summer. Their top midfield target

eh? what are you going on about now? I've never said he was the best in the league but one of the best which my comments says. The best one is Coventry's right back but Brittain is one of the best in the championship

I think Van Ewijk and Pereira are the best 2 in the league. then about 5 or 6 players similar quality of player and Brittain is one of that 5/6 in

we have good defenders and alot of them are playing champions league or previously have plenty of PL experiences. Hall is being slowly brough back into the first team. White is quality player for me. him, Guehi, Konsa, Burn and Colwill would be good 5 centre back to take the world cup

@KentExile has posted his CV so matched most of it what we wanted. lets judge Rhodes on the job he does here.

on Gueye, he hasn't progress under Ismael cos he doesn't suit our style anymore. on Gestede, he has been full control along with Owen and Ismael with signings this summer without in fighting we witness the summer previously exactly my point