chaddyrovers

suggestion I don't care about player welfare which is untrue but you played 80 mins, just finish the game instead of stopping and given McKenna what he wanted. yes I believe the game should have carry on and all it has done is proved that managers like McKenna can keep complaining and get their way. It was totally disgrace the way McKenna and his players celebrated with their fans getting what he wanted post game. I bet McKenna is laughing his head off now how he get that game stopped. Can't stand the guy anymore.

Like I said, I stand by my original opinion on whether the game should have carry on and I do Plenty of digs there from yourself unusual

back in 2021 when Rovers pitch was stitched. As Garner, you would the Environmental Agency to do building work and improve the drainage system in the River Darwen and also factoring in the number of new houses being building in the local area all using that River Darwen. Could Rovers build a storage tank facility on site to store more water and slowing disposal it into the River? I'm not an expert in this field btw My answer to your question was very clear and very direct that I stand my opinion . I gave you the answer which was what happens if we lose 1 or 2 key players between yesterday and the replay game stand by my original opinion

Wasn't the pitch revamp and stitched back in the summer 2021? The drainage problem required a non football situation probably and won't be a priority. Haven't already said several times I stand by my original opinion that I posted yesterday, so your question was already answered

I remember the game and the conditions and it was worst than yesterday. I posted the video for others.

Vale came on

Already answered this bloody question Rev, just get on with the rest of the game and play on. I've got nothing to add to my original opinion which I stand by.

Bias? my opinion has been constant from the end of the game. My original opinion I stand by, not much to really add to it. McKenna wasn't happy and you aren't trying to tell you wasn't making it know about the pitch given that his team were playing poor, losing 1 nil and down to 10 men, plus given his post match comments and the celebration with their fans after the game called off, he got exactly what he and they wanted. No I have suggestion a possible situation which you ignored competently in any of your post that the game which will be in a few weeks time, could mean we have injury or 2 to some of our players who started yesterday and played so well. on your last point I would suggested you read ParsonBlue and Only2Garners posts about the work that would be required and it would need Environment agency and possible the councils involve in finding a properly overall situation.

stretching your arguments to extreme lengths to prove your own opinion.

All ifs again. They played 80 mins on it and the rest of the game should have played. Nothing more to add. We played on worst pitches like Portsmouth home game 2017.

I've said my opinion on all this and I stand by this. Got nothing to add to this

Plenty of faith but Ipswich were down to 10 men and new signings haven't settled yet..in a few weeks that might not be the case. What happens if Toth and Cantwell are out injury when the game is replay if it is? What happens? I played the game Mark so no need for little pathetic cheap shot..my point has been the same along. Play the game. We played in worst conditions, FFS For we should be award the win.

No its was disagree thumb that what thumb down stand for on the forum. Just play the game out. The conditions were the same for both. Maybe we shouldn't play football in rain anymore at this rate Let's see if you disagree with the decision if the game is replay and we suffer a heavy defeat cos Ipswich are better form and new signings have settled in. Think about that one for minute

Should have to played the rest of the game out

We played in much worse condition. Portsmouth at home 2017 for example. Ipswich got what they wanted and Rovers got screwed again

In my first reply to you

McKenna wanted it off cos his team was down to 10 men and losing, wonder if he been in Rovers position whether he would have wanted the same? Of course not.

Totally stand by my original points on the game being called off and it should have carried on. McKenna got what he wanted and its a shame that the ref bottled it again given what we seen regular with poor standing of referring at all levels. Any replay game will favour Ipswich much more again given we were leading 1 nil and 11 players vs their 10. Personally Rovers should be given the win by the EFL board but they won't. Ipswich and McKenna knew that a game being called out would suit them.

I did answer your question with a similar point about having to replay the game when they are different form potentially and us missing key players potentially

Would it be your view when/if we replay the game in a couple of months when they bang in form and we have a couple of key players injured?

https://x.com/IpswichTown/status/1969462213803921856?t=-0q729q0KrMTtmHot4t2Sw&s=19

Conway scored that goal.. We have to disagree cos the game gone so far and should have complete. That's my view. We probably have to play them again when they are in good form and we got a couple of injuries

All on their new owners

Having gone into the 80th minute the game should have finished today. We seen worst conditions like Portsmouth at home in 2017 for example.

Full of excuses again.