Rhodes would not get in our side right now.He has hardly played or scored in 2 years so no he wouldn't walk into our side,especially when we play with one front man a role Rhodes could not play.Yes Rhodes scored loads of goals here but that was a couple of years ago,his confidence looks shot to pieces.Two years of not scoring goals or playing regularly is a long time. It would be between Hanley and Lenihan to partner Mulgrew.Hanley would be in now but I'm a big fan of Lenihan and if he stays injury free and continues to develop then there wouldn't be too much between them. Marshall on his day would get in the side but again he isn't anything special.He isn't consistent enough and half the time he doesn't look bothered. All 3 players are nothing special imo.Rhodes on 30 or 40 grand a week?No thanks. I'm not just saying this because they left, and I'm not criticising them for leaving ,the way the club was being rub and with our lack of ambition I don't blame them for moving on.But the 3 of them are nothing special.

That's all fair enough but still in the case of Rhodes, Hanley and Marshall their careers didn't benefit from the moves they made only their bank balances.Rhodes has spent 2 years sat on the bench,Marshall spent a lot of his time at wolves doing the same although he did have a good spell at Millwall but like I said in a previous post Marshall starts well at any club he joins and then he loses form and confidence and he ends up moving on.Hanley also spent most of his time at Newcastle not playing . Like iv seen people suggesting that Rhodes would have been a good signing he has done nothing for the last two seasons,even when he has played he has looked terrible.Maybe he will prove me wrong but I don't see him hitting the same sort of goalscoring form he has at Huddersfield and here.When he isn't putting the ball in the net it's like playing with 10 men he offers nothing else.

They turned down bids for Rhodes .I'm not disputing eventually they were happy to cash in but all 3 players wanted to leave too.

Wake him up and ask if the maddison rumours are true?

In fairness Rhodes has spent most his time on the bench since he left. Hanley wasn't a regular at Newcastle but seemed to do ok at Norwich. Marshall starts off well at clubs but then it goes down hill. Will be interesting to see how Norwich do next season and seeing if Rhodes can rediscover his goalscoring form.

Plus they bid 9 mill for that Reid from Bristol who went to Cardiff. I'd be buzzing if we brought in Maddison could see him having a similar impact to Dack.He is more than capable of performing in the Championship.

Doubt it as he was asked on his Twitter if Sunderland were in for any of their players and he said no

Rhodes having a medical at Norwich tomorrow. Season long loan

I sent a few tweets asking about rovers interest in him...No reply and I'm sure other rovers fans have asked same but no mention on his timeline.He is answering other clubs fans

Can i ask what are you basing this on?His stats don't read too impressive but like you say maybe they would be better if he played for a better team.Are you basing your opinion on watching him numerous times?

Happy with the signings of Davenport and Rothwell but at end of day they have limited championship experience and this Harrison is the same.I think we need to be bringing in 1 or 2 who are proven in the championship now.

Why when we already have Bell and Williams?Be a bit silly to start playing an ageing midfielder at full back.dont you think?

Have you heard this from a reliable source?Not asking your source just if it's reliable

Iv heard from someone else (not nixon) that we have enquired about Kent.He was poor at Bristol last season but maybe that was down to his first half season in Germany.He was good in his previous loan spells

You know this as fact?

The article only hints at a buy back clause hopefully if there is such a clause it's city having a first refusal rather than a set buy back fee.I think it's quite positive that they have put such clauses in his deal.He must be well thought of at City

Who?

The king transfer went to tribunal You are right mate apologies just checked and we agreed a deal with Bournemouth..hopefully we were smart enough to include a sell on clause

Kings move to Bournemouth went to tribunal so there will be a sell on Clause.I think it could be 20

Being linked with a 5 million move.Plus I would imagine he is on a huge wage

Croatia played poorly against Denmark but if they play to their potential then they have every chance of beating England. Might have to start both Henderson and Dier in that game can't afford Rakitic and Modric to dominate the ball and control the game

What I meant is it's unfair to label him a one season wonder after watching him have two poor games against a far superior side

He isn't according to sky

You can't really judge Marriot on the games against us he was feeding off scraps. In the game at Ewood he had only returned from injury

Been training with Celtic. Think he could be close to joining them