There’s no supposedly about what the collateral is: https://s3.eu-west-2.amazonaws.com/document-api-images-live.ch.gov.uk/docs/jdzuT7QMhDr0sZzyJ9xy12ono2p23o1Fc2sSrP_udE8/application-pdf?X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Credential=ASIAWRGBDBV3BC3YPMJA%2F20240521%2Feu-west-2%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20240521T135156Z&X-Amz-Expires=60&X-Amz-Security-Token=IQoJb3JpZ2luX2VjEMn%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2FwEaCWV1LXdlc3QtMiJGMEQCIHcwIxj6BbgQmciNQBh6eb3aX5TrulT29RkKJ6vqroxjAiAYSkknr552Nw%2FEf%2BPQUpxP9UklRhsh2M7b29lHHKKqoSq6BQhCEAUaDDQ0OTIyOTAzMjgyMiIM0KdF%2BpYt5RPv307YKpcF8j4NDSw8PPwhdM9DhrNx3lqNOH0%2FaaQsKw41LnYfYI%2F8lgShXfqa0hgZRClw81Tyr7QJjle0mfCpXOIlfLQaoswORr8zrclxZlSl65W7qczJw7MWpO74WGyfkVuYWdwKC4HQQrNG%2Fpyx7H6YHsYP5k9DZQ9QfYR9Og%2FB4VdHD%2BkpLNJTzRJFKOusmkNy2Y0UHkS30i1stKEgKYuVe7xxthnq7%2FKzbbUHSfzWrO5k5LBia48SP68Q9FCXnDU8SW%2BJuCg9mTzK7mlodLQhQqZ4Pqfvv2ypKXRremGGpJAoqfiKB6LzCssoPwJMvpyEwQOi9xin4aSEocMaW%2F3%2BGJq0fFQh%2BdP6Hf6EfekDVDT%2FGx2iMG587veA9GzBM5ckbC2tdFPB5zPJ4gV%2FuhhOrvYLtjdekwf7iuyEt3GHOKvXv7ZrQZwkYedixojOWkR0voSn354nnfn1I3W2wKQgVA32NdWdM%2BDg%2BdasJi6tZm%2B8YtfM8xOW%2FMzv5LHYsT%2FkunHQ3a0N1U55gqwrzmKY0gEYdQNhHGn3MTEd7AwJjT7XuMv8M0tYcKvY6%2BrxKdC%2BlgYAsX5kk1VsUHjYHU3DA7ewkA29mmja9rca6wl4ks3sFoR1kaz9ttIwwyC7B81%2FomuukVyAbGI1oQtYeARoIHz7ReyV%2FKmEo2UNxwFnFVjFTwxreXBhobZEYHv8xhqS9udrZkjgYFq8awz%2BqxiFaQ89ZRtt1pbXrT99OdImS%2FbtOurfmJTsxDL5MqQce2YFcbgjtP1y71I0wg27zkNAvjQhEAxsRQ3HuxzJsnEsIKa%2FvPJz5WgK8OBzpzJq1fV7Ex5qCzRIOyB8oAPKR%2BeghLiyL2rjhitEfZ%2F%2BsaCpPfvm3hjPJswk5ihiMK7CsbIGOrIBJTKdtTrKz%2FdheaIR2rqxHPu4ZM3LHoG%2BiYZQzm7WrfGwHQtReECoqH6nEAdexZmsaFuLNIvxZre8zVDlag6Lr1BPk%2Bq0uin3EJGTzsod0JLi8jwTzkAmZVoH48G%2B%2BSQ4RS%2BDFP%2FREf5l7tWxUiOyDpoQ1cU%2FrgJ5EPGD9UBCVixHVYjjulwSt%2FG4egj5%2BRcaUNtbMS9mYjOAyZgf%2FWikHmVQ%2BrHR0taKQGrCPiqlHNqcyg%3D%3D&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&response-content-disposition=inline%3Bfilename%3D"13452736_mr01_2023-10-23.pdf"&X-Amz-Signature=b38858d71b5b714d0f6167e58a200a772f0878fbd723c01a11ba01e3226feb9f

The first ever VAR error?

Yes it does - it is recognised on a pro rata basis as each of the home matches is played. Until then it is deemed a contract liability (deferred revenue). Edited to add below screenshots…

Don’t forget Myles…

but fair?

We’re going to know exactly how their sisters feel.

They’ll probably point out we made as much profit on Wharton as all your examples added together. In doing so they’d be failing to realise how he was the exception and not the rule.

Last season a BBE adult season ticket cost £4 more than 17 match day tickets (I’ve used the cat b price for this)

One of them’s our CEO!!

Herman’s Hermits - No Milk Today

But you have to offset that against the goal scoring bonus we’re saving 🤔

They’d need to be put on the shelves first

Guns N’ Roses - Welcome To The Jungle

Fun - We Are Young

Groove Armada - I See You Baby

The only other option would be an agreement with the Directorate Of Enforcement but if that was the case we wouldn’t have been fed the ‘technical and procedural issues’ line.

I think it’s beyond obvious that Adam was sold because the case was adjourned.

Agreement with who?

I suspect SW told them that as an absolute fact whereas the accounts make clear the club assumed all future requests would be approved.

I work on the assumption if the club say something without providing evidence then it’s probably a load of bollocks.

Perhaps @Mike Graham could be of help here…

I don’t see how it can be interpreted in any other way.

I think if that was the case it would say so in the court document (confirming the adjournment).

The below is from the club’s accounts - the final paragraph seems (I’m being generous) to contradict SW’s assertions…