Looks right to me

Has the higher price (+ £2 on the phone/in person) for buying match day tickets ‘on the day’ returned or did it never go away?

Yep, it’s when the club performs its part of the contract that matters.

You might be a Kenny but you’re not THE Kenny 😁

Yes

Did you see my reply to this question?

Maybe it’s Kenny…

It’s an extra £8 as there’s also a £2 fee for online purchases. (I don’t agree with it mind, just pointing out the sums)

I can’t help with this but our 94/95 our average attendance was around 66% higher (than 22/23) but our gate receipts were only 10% higher.

But by making the price rise so steep they’re hoping everyone buys now. They want quick cash not the most cash (also see sale of A Wharton)

It’s the same one isn’t it? (V12)

Trying to encourage early purchases because they’re desperate for some cash?

I’d do it for free but I’m not sure I’d be value for money 😁

Wrong culture but harakari is considered honourable…

A few days (if that)

He’s pretty much the same player he was at Rovers, the major difference is in the quality of his teammates.

For me the fee was on the low side of fair. What concerns me is whether we insisted on the add ons that his potential warranted.

There’s no supposedly about what the collateral is: https://s3.eu-west-2.amazonaws.com/document-api-images-live.ch.gov.uk/docs/jdzuT7QMhDr0sZzyJ9xy12ono2p23o1Fc2sSrP_udE8/application-pdf?X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Credential=ASIAWRGBDBV3BC3YPMJA%2F20240521%2Feu-west-2%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20240521T135156Z&X-Amz-Expires=60&X-Amz-Security-Token=IQoJb3JpZ2luX2VjEMn%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2FwEaCWV1LXdlc3QtMiJGMEQCIHcwIxj6BbgQmciNQBh6eb3aX5TrulT29RkKJ6vqroxjAiAYSkknr552Nw%2FEf%2BPQUpxP9UklRhsh2M7b29lHHKKqoSq6BQhCEAUaDDQ0OTIyOTAzMjgyMiIM0KdF%2BpYt5RPv307YKpcF8j4NDSw8PPwhdM9DhrNx3lqNOH0%2FaaQsKw41LnYfYI%2F8lgShXfqa0hgZRClw81Tyr7QJjle0mfCpXOIlfLQaoswORr8zrclxZlSl65W7qczJw7MWpO74WGyfkVuYWdwKC4HQQrNG%2Fpyx7H6YHsYP5k9DZQ9QfYR9Og%2FB4VdHD%2BkpLNJTzRJFKOusmkNy2Y0UHkS30i1stKEgKYuVe7xxthnq7%2FKzbbUHSfzWrO5k5LBia48SP68Q9FCXnDU8SW%2BJuCg9mTzK7mlodLQhQqZ4Pqfvv2ypKXRremGGpJAoqfiKB6LzCssoPwJMvpyEwQOi9xin4aSEocMaW%2F3%2BGJq0fFQh%2BdP6Hf6EfekDVDT%2FGx2iMG587veA9GzBM5ckbC2tdFPB5zPJ4gV%2FuhhOrvYLtjdekwf7iuyEt3GHOKvXv7ZrQZwkYedixojOWkR0voSn354nnfn1I3W2wKQgVA32NdWdM%2BDg%2BdasJi6tZm%2B8YtfM8xOW%2FMzv5LHYsT%2FkunHQ3a0N1U55gqwrzmKY0gEYdQNhHGn3MTEd7AwJjT7XuMv8M0tYcKvY6%2BrxKdC%2BlgYAsX5kk1VsUHjYHU3DA7ewkA29mmja9rca6wl4ks3sFoR1kaz9ttIwwyC7B81%2FomuukVyAbGI1oQtYeARoIHz7ReyV%2FKmEo2UNxwFnFVjFTwxreXBhobZEYHv8xhqS9udrZkjgYFq8awz%2BqxiFaQ89ZRtt1pbXrT99OdImS%2FbtOurfmJTsxDL5MqQce2YFcbgjtP1y71I0wg27zkNAvjQhEAxsRQ3HuxzJsnEsIKa%2FvPJz5WgK8OBzpzJq1fV7Ex5qCzRIOyB8oAPKR%2BeghLiyL2rjhitEfZ%2F%2BsaCpPfvm3hjPJswk5ihiMK7CsbIGOrIBJTKdtTrKz%2FdheaIR2rqxHPu4ZM3LHoG%2BiYZQzm7WrfGwHQtReECoqH6nEAdexZmsaFuLNIvxZre8zVDlag6Lr1BPk%2Bq0uin3EJGTzsod0JLi8jwTzkAmZVoH48G%2B%2BSQ4RS%2BDFP%2FREf5l7tWxUiOyDpoQ1cU%2FrgJ5EPGD9UBCVixHVYjjulwSt%2FG4egj5%2BRcaUNtbMS9mYjOAyZgf%2FWikHmVQ%2BrHR0taKQGrCPiqlHNqcyg%3D%3D&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&response-content-disposition=inline%3Bfilename%3D"13452736_mr01_2023-10-23.pdf"&X-Amz-Signature=b38858d71b5b714d0f6167e58a200a772f0878fbd723c01a11ba01e3226feb9f

The first ever VAR error?

Yes it does - it is recognised on a pro rata basis as each of the home matches is played. Until then it is deemed a contract liability (deferred revenue). Edited to add below screenshots…

Don’t forget Myles…

but fair?

We’re going to know exactly how their sisters feel.

They’ll probably point out we made as much profit on Wharton as all your examples added together. In doing so they’d be failing to realise how he was the exception and not the rule.