wilsdenrover

Seems like one month with Parker was enough 😁😁

Wikipedia (yes I know! 😄) says he signed a new one year contract with you on the 6th July this year. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jóhann_Berg_Guðmundsson#Al-Orobah

Last season we scored 7 goals in the final 15 minutes, this year we’re on 4 already.

Rovers last set of accounts confirm the training ground had been paid for in full on 25th October 2023.

The announcement is a minimum of so that must cover anything up to 1 minute 59 seconds.

I reckon Suhail wrote it.

Yep Statement eulogises the new structure for identifying key areas of improvement including the first team and claims the owner’s will support the club as and when needed. The combination of these two things surely indicates we’ll be unlocking that war chest in the next few days… Unless, and surely it can’t be this, they’re just talking bollocks again. (I still don’t think they have got those permissions but am happy to agree to disagree as you suggested to someone else yesterday)

What a load of twaddle.

It would be nice if another hearing would go ahead so we can (maybe) finally find out for certain what Venky’s are trying to achieve. I think a good thing to ask SW would be for him to explain how his assertion the owners can fund the club doesn’t contradict the statements in the club’s accounts (re the court cases to date) A better thing still would be the Venkys to finally read the room and fuck right off.

Thanks - not from a reliable source then 😄😄

The first match I went to.

Get Santa to contact this chap… https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caganer

Last minute incomings? what could possibly go wrong with that?…

Where has personal guarantee come from? The court documents describe it as an unconditional bank guarantee to be provided by the petitioner which is VHPL.

Next debate, what does a larger bench mean? 🤔🧐😁

https://www.rovers.co.uk/news/2024/august/21/ticket-news--burnley-v-rovers/#

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enforcement_Directorate

The two clubs have to agree on the price - maybe for once it’s not our lots fault. Then again…

I wonder if that’s why today was listed as a final hearing. ie to agree on a ‘solution’ which would be in place until the conclusion of the EDs investigation.

Don’t forget their reputation…

The rules ‘reassess’ the fitness of someone to be a director of a club on a season by season basis. Unless I’m misreading things, they only assess owners at the point they’re wanting to buy a club. As you allude to, it’s ridiculous they don’t seem to ‘keep an eye’ on owners after the acquisition has taken place.

We’d probably end up in the farcical position of they wouldn’t be allowed to buy the club but they would be allowed to continue to own it.

point 1 of the order - Venkys asked for permission to send remittances (plural) totalling circa £11 million point 2 of the order - The breakdown of what these remittances are needed for. point 12 of the order - Grants permission for the £11 million to be sent subject to certain conditions (the lettered clauses following this point) conditions b and c (which I presume you’re referring to) therefore only applies to this £11 million. edited to add - if this order covered all future remittances Venkys wouldn’t have gone back to court in January to make a further request:

The extract Duncan shared showed the court allowed those monies to be sent (circa £11 million) - it did not give permission for any further monies to be sent. The extract from the club’s accounts I posted earlier (I’ll do so again here) states that Venkys aren’t currently in control of whether they can send funds to the club or not (second paragraph) The below also confirms Venkys believe the precedent has been set for the court to approve all future requests but if these hearing keep getting postponed they, and us, are never going to find out It’s of course possible something has changed since the accounts were finalised but no documented proof has been provided for this