Not if you have a hard copy NHS pass. Or a -ve Lateral flow test result.

I doubt anyone has ever suffered because they haven't had something to eat for three hours.

Do you need evidence of vaccination and a LTF, -ve result. Or just either.

If you don't want the food or drink, then don't buy it.

Or hope that Dack makes a successful recovery.

I bet it is an improved contact as well.

If you make a fool of somebody

Whatever the deal is. We as paying customers are being shafted.

If a new ACV is applied for, and Venkys don't object, if there is an objection it must be from Waggot.

From those minutes, what information have you learned ?

I have read them and I refer you to my previous quote.

So basically no information or change.

I agree that nowhere does the article imply that there is doubt that he will be here next season. But what it doesn't state, is that the option has been triggered

With reference to Carters future. I think that of the center backs on our books, he is 4th choice behind Lenihan, Wharton and Ayala. His problem is that he maywell, be soon overtaken in the pecking order by Ash Phillips.

If you don't know the exact wording of the option, I would not go assuming anything. We haven't got a good history recently, for making beneficial contracts.

That article just says, that the option has been confirmed, not that it has been triggered ?

Which is exactly the point I first made. One of the main reasons for losing possession at throw ins, is allowing the opposition time to mark up, by stealing yards down the line instead of getting the ball back into play as quickly as you can.

I think it will be Huddersfield or Cardiff, because they are the teams we play the week before and after the cup game.

You were made for me.

Preferably one that can take throw-ins

The post that you are quoting, was were I said teams on the programme "Big Match Revisited" take their throw-ins quickly and usually retain possession. That is games from the 70's and 80's, not nowadays teams.

Exactly, that is what this discussion started as. The fact that teams at the moment don't know how to keep possession from throw-ins. Years ago it was not a problem.

I suggest you watch The Big Match revisted on Saturday mornings, You will see every team takes throw-ins very quickly and usually they keep possession. It really is that simple.

Can I be Freddie.

It's simple really, you take the throw quickly before the opposition can mark-up. Most teams have a player whose job is to mark the thrower, so that negates the extra man.