Venky’s v Indian Government (a) - 5/8/2025 - Post-Season Friendly (s/t late postponements)

[Tomphil2]

25 minutes ago, Brian-Potter said:

On the shareholder thing just need clarify the owenship structure. Assuming by shareholders you are referring to those of Venkys India Ltd which is a public company listed on the stock exchange in which VHPL own a large proportion of the shares. VHPL is 100% privately owned and owns VLL (amongst numerous other companies) which in turn owns BRFC. Venkys India Ltd has nothing directly to do with Rovers. 
 

I posted a link a while back to the latest ratings agency report on VHPL which gives an insight into its structure, borrowings and cash position. It's rating is A+++ with extremely strong liquidity.

Apart from being on the shirts and plastered around the stadium.

So we presume that VHPL is owned soley by the Rao's ?

Which would fit into the they call all the shots and can never be questioned by anyone here or in India narrative.

[Exiled_Rover]

2 hours ago, Tomphil2 said:

Aye that's my point really as although they are fabulously wealthy i think that wealth is overstated and is all assets combined.

The way they fund the club from what we see is the main VH group sends money for bills from its huge monthly turnover and the club via VLL just sits in the accounts somewhere soaking excess money up.

So to send 10/20 mill a year over with the same amount guarantees against the business or assets is then stacking up extra debt against it all.  Otherwise securing against personal money/assets if it goes on and on is tying huge amounts of money up and of course one wrong move or the govt decide to shaft them they'll keep the money or hold it forever, especially say if a full war breaks out over there.

We moan quite rightly because they are in danger of dragging Rovers down again after propping it up off the pitch for years but it really isn't a straight forward issue unless restrictions are lifted.

Even then i doubt previous levels of funding will ever be reinstated given their profit margins are now massively reduced due to price increase of raw materials. As you say though it's nothing like the slant SwagHail and the apprentice tea boy are putting on it and i suspect there are alarm bells on standby down there.

Shaft them for doing something illegal?

If it's such a burden they should sell the club - nobody with any sense wants them here.

[Bohinen1983]

If this gets sorted is it going to unlock a war-chest for transfers?

[simongarnerisgod]

well it`s finally confirmed ,the facebook mob and let happy clappers will have to admit it,waggot is a lieing toad.most fans  with a brain cell had it figured out years ago tbh

[Brian-Potter]

59 minutes ago, Tomphil2 said:

Apart from being on the shirts and plastered around the stadium.

So we presume that VHPL is owned soley by the Rao's ?

Which would fit into the they call all the shots and can never be questioned by anyone here or in India narrative.

Yes, VHPL is privately owned by the Rao's 

[Moptop1]

1 hour ago, simongarnerisgod said:

well it`s finally confirmed ,the facebook mob and let happy clappers will have to admit it,waggot is a lieing toad.most fans  with a brain cell had it figured out years ago tbh

But, but it’s the fans fault, not the lying bastards who run and own the club. That has never been the case. You are mistaken about that.🤔

[Devon Rover]

So, what was the outcome of the hearing??

[simongarnerisgod]

21 minutes ago, Devon Rover said:

So, what was the outcome of the hearing??

apparently the bond that venkys have to pay to send money here has been halved, waggots claim that there was no restriction was clearly a lie and he should be sacked

[Tomphil2]

2 hours ago, Exiled_Rover said:

Shaft them for doing something illegal?

If it's such a burden they should sell the club - nobody with any sense wants them here.

I wouldn't trust ANY govt to hold bonds or guarantees of tens of millions regardless of what it's for.

[Forever Blue]

3 hours ago, Bohinen1983 said:

If this gets sorted is it going to unlock a war-chest for transfers?

Haha, see what you did there. Good one!

[Forever Blue]

10 hours ago, lraC said:

It was always very cleverly worded by Waggott and as usual just a smokescreen, to yet again, hoodwink the fans into believe that everything is okay and the wonderful owners we have, will continue to fund us.

Some, of the fans, accepted the no impediment line, but some knew better and saw that there was one huge impediment and here we have it today, confirmed in court that we were yet again, lied to.

There isn’t an impediment, they choose not to fund us because they don’t want to pay the bond. 
 

It’s a simple choice that Billionaires have made to save a few million. 

 

Edited 2 hours ago by Forever Blue

[Upside Down]

As far as I'm aware, they've still to get a No Objection Certificate prior to sending funds. The guarantee is a condition of them receiving the certificate from the ED. This was a compromise agreement when they were refused the certificate the other year.

[lraC]

1 hour ago, Forever Blue said:

There isn’t an impediment, they choose not to fund us because they don’t want to pay the bond. 
 

It’s a simple choice that Billionaires have made to save a few million. 

 

The court ruled today to reduce the none existent impediment from 100% to 50.%. 

[Forever Blue]

3 minutes ago, lraC said:

The court ruled today to reduce the none existent impediment from 100% to 50.%. 

Correct. They’ve reduced the amount Billionaires have to pay in a bond. There is no impediment. Glad you’ve finally grasped it! 

[47er]

They never bought Rovers as a stand alone business set apart from their main industry---chickens!

That leads me to believe that it was always a means of writing off losses and not costing Venkys much in real terms.

The problem is that their incompetence has created losses far bigger than expected.