Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Everything posted by Bigdoggsteel

  1. Indeed. At least they did sack him before the end of the season though. What position were we in then actually?
  2. At this stage it's bad either way, they have dragged it out to the point where another manager hasn't had the end of the season to take a look, so a new appointment will already be playing catch up. Or they just aren't sacking him. Like it's hardly option C and they have the Barnsley manager lined up. We can dream though
  3. Some bizzare stuff, but this would be beyond the pale. I think that all the signs point to nobody knows what's happening, at best.
  4. Nobody is stopping anyone posting what they want, so can we stop saying thats a things that's happening?
  5. No,me neither, but it's a mental state of affairs The way Mowbray is talking though. Is he that deluded? Surely if the ITKs here heard it, he has heard it? If it's as conclusive as they say. I'm not trying to be snide by saying that
  6. Ya keep sharing ,but don't act like a child if some people question the validity of that. The manager doesn't realise he has been sacked ,so it's a bit odd. Someone should really tell him he has already been sacked. Cos he definitely doesn't know. In fact he thinks the exact opposite. Crazy club
  7. A couple of vague things from a long time ago plus "not as big things". Cool. Conclusive evidence. You have predicted far ,far more that hasn't happened. Say what you want. It's a free country/message board. Not sure why you are getting so defensive anyway if you believe your source. Bit odd that. I didnt mean it in a snide way, apologies as it may have come accross like that. The fact you are on the edges of "I told you so" already about your info though, tells me a story. Anyway, I hope you're right
  8. I get sick of them when it's something this serious! Some saying them here will be on giving it the "I told you so" if/when he is sacked, but it seems to me that no one knows more than anyone else. Obviously and logically he should be gone. So it's not that difficult a prediction to make or rumour to start
  9. How many things have you predicted that didn't happen? Even a broken clock is right twice a day
  10. Wishful thinking I reckon. The "coincidences" are tentative at best, plus he is getting to renew contracts ,for example Johnson. Brokhall has nothing to do with anything, just that the public rejected it and there is no evidence India have changed communication at all. Rumours on message boards are all they are. We all know he should be gone, so it's easy to say he will be. However the fact he is still here now alone shows that this is not a normally run club.
  11. Didn't work out too bad for Brentford signing Toney, or us with Dack.
  12. Different for me on Ifollow, but I would be hesitant to watch as the football was so bad at stages this season. Toothless possession for the sake of it. Gallagher on the wing. Just not enjoyable unfortunately.
  13. Nothing, but what's the difference between that and a team in this division who have made the play offs resting players?
  14. https://www.skysports.com/football/news/11667/12302190/man-utd-vs-leicester-amad-diallo-and-shola-shoretire-set-to-feature Integrity and playing full strength teams is for small clubs and losers. Enormous stakes here and Ole don't care
  15. Are the Preston fans happy with that appointment? Fairly underwhelming I would say
  16. Nope and I think it's time we all came to terms with that
  17. Bit of a tricky question, I think it's only sustainable for so long without being promoted. Unless you are a team like Brentford whose scouting is excellent. You would think that they could only take so many play off losses too before things fell apart. Once you get up once and get the parachute money , the pressure is off for a while. So, no I don't think it's possible to just be in the division every year and make money. Ultimately you need promotion
  18. Now, that's a name. Bannan. I think he's a great player. For our "possession based" game, that's a no brainer if it could be done
  19. Sharpe should stop writing this nonsense and deal with the elephant in the room.
  20. Douglas definetely had some decent games in one of our more positive runs. Disappointing compared to what we expected though. Bell might do something good, but he's not consistent in a game. He's not a good player. Too many weaknesses at this level. I would have kept Douglas as back up to Pickering, but I'm not too upset either are leaving. That's probably why he is leaving. Doesn't want to be back up.
  21. Douglas had some good games after a pretty shakey start. I know some of you are in the blinkered category now and it's all bad, but it wasn't..well not compared to Bell anyway. Dreadful player.
  22. Douglas was still better than Bell, even though he was a shadow of his former self Anyone who disagrees , name 1 game where Bell played consistly well. Let's say an 8/10 performance. In his entire time here. I'm waiting. Douglas had some poor games, but clearly technically and positionally far superior to Bell. Was unlucky not to score a goal or two as well
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.