Hasta

No shit Einstein.

He thinks the current structure is guaranteed £x amount per season, and that his his target. Reducing costs is a risk. It might bring in more money (and a better atmosphere). But it could also lead to reduced turnover (and a better atmosphere). Waggot doesn’t want to grow or improve the business. He just wants to hit target A and get paid. So he sticks with the status quo.

You should blame the ref for allowing it 😂

JRC treating it like an East Lancs Derby. The Nuremberg fans go wild. (Google translated obviously)

Well yeah, it was hit and hope. Just like Steven Reid and Tony Yeboah

Cracking finish. It's like watching it live on the ground with this camera angle.

Ok. Ta.

Carter captain with both Hyam and Travis in starting 11

He’s just an attention grabber who wants followers and knows nothing. Probably loves the fact he gets quoted on here. He just wants to stir the pot and get Rovers fans frothing at the mouth. Dick. The other one might actually be a Rovers Insider.

Fair comment. I’m just presuming the parachute money, and the clubs which benefit, in the championship would mean those clubs were stronger. The rest of the league not so much so.

Eric Engelhardt is just a sign of the times. His record compared to some people we have been linked with from abroad in the past is OK at an OK level (which I suspect is below Championship football). He's 26 so is at his peak so is unlikely to improve. I doubt he would look completely lost like Telalovic, but if I was being optimistic I suspect he will be interchangeable with the likes of Gally and Leonard up top. It's disappointing, but whilst the taps are off it's about as good as the "Heads of" are going to come up with I'm afraid.

"Hi Dad, I'm meeting this guy called Waggot tomorrow for talks. You ever heard of him?"

Unlike JDT, he will probably want paying off rather than just walking. He’d be better staying till September 1st then blasting Suhail and Waggot in an interview

Rovers would actually be Scotland 🤣 Rank 39

Both beat the teams they should have beat but lost every time they hit a 50/50 or worse game, with the exception of Argentina in 2002.

Southgate= Sven

There’s one way he can solve the argument once and for all.

Edit - Sorry, you mean the McGuire deal and not the fall out.

I've re-read it about 10 times and I genuinely don't know what you mean. I think you've misread what I've said somewhere. All I've said is "if we had lost to Argentina in the group stage we would have been practically eliminated". It's a fact. The table had we lost would have been: Argentina P2 Pts 6 Sweden P2 Pts 4 England P2 Pts 1 Nigeria P2 Pts 0 You said we wouldn't have been practically eliminated as beating Nigeria in the final game would have got us through regardless of the SWE /ARG result, which is simply not true.

How so? Had we lost we would have had 1 point, Argentina 6 points and Sweden 4 points. It would have been out of our hands. There was huge pressure on us going into that game.

I'm with you here. Sven qualified for every tournament, got out of every group and never lost in a major tournament to a team we were expected to beat. However like Southgate, every game which I felt was 50/50 or worse he lost with the exception of Argentina in the groups in 2002. Had we lost that game we would have been practically eliminated and we won. That's why I have Southgate and Sven in similar regard, despite the obvious better progression deeper into tournaments by Southgate.

Southgate has got better as the tournament has gone on - slowly. The Trent experiment in the first game clearly didn't seem to work, but even after he put Mainoo in the slow, ponderous build-up and lack of any incision was awful. It clearly needed changing and yet we still approached the first knockout game against Slovakia the same way, and it took a Big Sam-style long throw and a piece of brilliance to save us. If we hadn't switched to 3 at the back I doubt we would have gone through the next two games. But fortunately he did, and credit for actually doing it. His substitutions have also worked out, from Toney in the first two knockout games to Watkins spectacularly last time. I said before the tournament he wins the games we expect to win (when many England managers haven't to be fair), but every time I've got to a game I think is 50/50 or worse he's lost. Regardless of whether its due to luck or not, on Sunday we have the first game I expect us to struggle in. If he wants to leap out of the Sven / Venables bracket, this again is the chance. Even if we lose though, he's still done well in another tournament. People calling him poor are forgetting 2008 to 2016

We have to have someone in that role to oversee outgoings as well as incomings. Our "ambition" is to sell players for a profit to fund the club, avoid relegation somehow and hoodwink the fans that there is a crumb of ambition leftso they still turn up to some degree. Eustace will be on less than JDT. Gestede will be on less than Gregg. The whole new scouting/transfer team will be on less than the previous one. Cheston and Silvester's replacements will be on less than the previous incumbents. I reckon there's only two senior employees at Rovers who haven't been replaced for cheaper alternatives. No prizes given for guessing who.

Miserable? Im ecstatic we won, enjoyed the last two performances and really looking forward to Sunday. But, like with Martin Olsson at Burnley, I can admit it wasn't a penalty. Do I care that we were helped getting through because of a dodgy penalty? Not one bit. I've never had as many downvotes on a post though 🤣

It’s clearly not a foul either way. Kane kicks the ball and follows through and then goes into the defender. But it’s Kane who goes into the defender and not the other way round. There more of an argument (wrongly) for a foul on the defender than on Kane.