The Ballad of a Shit Plan

Yes, the one you quoted. Nothing to hide there and it wasn't offensive. But you are a very defensive character who is prone to emotional outbursts when questioned about anything so I was actually saving you the distress. Thank me later 😉 I'm just staggered you actually think you can claim objectivity. Baffling.

I don't see any 'attacks'? Just a fella with a plan and a tetchy nature.

Calm down. Why are you offended? You're a club sponsor. You aren't impartial. The end. Anyway, who sent you the plans?

You and Venky's both.

Yay for job losses🙄

By sponsoring the club/company/whatever you are essentially approving of the way it's run, and are happy to be associated with it. In return you get exposure and a chance to grow your business. So, as Matty says, you aren't objective.

"a new residential community which is both respective and responsive to the local character of Brockhall Village". That's page 1. Doesn't even make sense.

B'mouth home to Cardiff midweek. 6th is there for the taking for quite a few clubs. We could have been one of them with a better manager.

Why the Cowley Brothers over Neil? Any new appointment is a risk but not sure what they have that sets them apart. They've done well at one lower league club. Neil is young but has done a good job at all 3 clubs he's managed. PNE sell their best players continually and yet he's still got a win % at PNE of 39%. That is decent. I'd take him over Mowbray any day pf the week. Just my opinion.

Semantics aside, there is no evidence Venkys signed off on that statement. I doubt very much that they are hands on with the 'redevelopment' of Brockhall. Others will be in charge of that. Like the three stooges...

Why would you imagine that? Any evidence?

What a crock of shit.

He should leave now and have some decency.

Excellent, thanks.

@den yeah, that's how I read it.

Who are defunct? Walkers Trust? It also says an appeal can be made to an Upper Tribunal.

The Rovers Trust Board feels very concerned about a dangerous precedent being set here. Its research shows that the Covenant placed at the time of the sale of the Club state that the Club shall not apply for planning permission for and not erect any buildings for residential or commercial use [other than for sports and recreation]. Today’s news flagrantly disregards part of the terms of The Walker Trust sale and it feels strongly that the Club consider this and respond in full as a matter of urgency. Are covenants legally binding? Edit All You Need to Know About Covenants (land-registry-documents.co.uk) Seems a covenant can be overturned either at the request of the people who put the covenant in (Walker Trust) or through a legal process (Tribunal). I think that's basically it but no expert so could be wrong.

Can anyone tell me of a good gym in the Blackburn area? Preferably a bit posh, no meat heads and full of attractive ladies in their 30's and 40's. 😉

I'm genuinely struggling to come to terms with the arrogance of the man and his 'performance-related' comments. They really are Kean-esque. Mowbray obviously thinks he's bigger than the club if he thinks his 'philosophies' are more important than results. I've never known any other manager come out with such nonsense. Ever. Results matter, nothing else. Mowbray Out.

He's been right so far.

Exactly, he doesn't do accountability, he's a very dishonest character.

🤣 That should probably be a BRFCS press release.

He's just utterly shameless.