Jump to content

BRFCS

BY THE FANS, FOR THE FANS, SINCE 1996
Proudly partnered with TheTerraceStore.com

islander200

Members
  • Posts

    8370
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    15

Everything posted by islander200

  1. If Rovers went back on their word over a fee they would sell Sammie for ,then I would have expected a transfer request and Szmodic not playing. You say that you would just "expect Ipswich to pay it" but various media outlets had their first bid at £6 million which is quite clearly Ipswich taking the piss not rovers. I for one am absolutely delighted Szmodic is still at the club and Sammie is performing.
  2. Why would the club tell Szmodic he can leave for £8 million? Why wouldn't there have been a clause stipulating a release figure in his contract? It makes zero sense
  3. What do you think we should accept for Szmodic? Various media outlets had their first bid at £6 million.Which is way way too low. Szmodic is under contract here and even the figures of 8/9 million is too low. Szmodic is playing and playing well we should be looking for as much as we can get for him....this gentleman's agreement doing the rounds makes zero sense...why would a clause not have been put in his latest contract?
  4. Why would Rovers promise Szmodic he could leave for a certain fee? I dont think it is Waggott holding it up, I just think no club has bid enough. But if we follow your thinking then surely we should be happy with club in this instance? Szmodic has already helped us get 3 points in the league and through to the next round of the cup
  5. Ipswich first bid that was reported was £6 million pounds,an embarrassing bid for the championship top scorer. Its quite clearly Ipswich that are not meeting Szmodic valuation. And at the end of the day even if it is rovers who are holding it up then who cares?He is playing in the games so far and scoring goals. Some on here just want us to accept whatever bid Ipswich have put in.Its madness
  6. Agreed we should all be hoping that Szmodic stays. If he is sold there won't be a warchest ,£1 or £2 million would go back in.Loans will definitely happen regardless if Szmodic is sold or not
  7. I'm guessing it's either Rushworth or Ruddy. Sheffield United out of the Rushworth race now after signing Cooper.
  8. I asked nixon if he has heard anymore about a goalkeeper, he replied that should have an answer over a keeper by the weekend.He didn't give a name
  9. We had bids turned down for De Lange without selling Szmodic that money should still be there. Loan signings will be made regardless over what happens with Sammie
  10. We will still sign loan players....if we sell szmodic what are they really going to spend? £1 or £2 million?
  11. Telegraph saying we do have a year option on Hyam
  12. We know for sure loans will happen, and on the evidence of the recruitment so far we should feel confident better than Markanday will be brought in
  13. It's Ipswich fucking about with piss poor bids FFS .
  14. At the end of the day Szmodic is playing and playing well,goal scored and an assist .Wether it was the clubs decision or Szmodic insistence they gave him 3 weeks off more or less to get the deal sorted and Ipswich haven't met the clubs valuation. If the club are overvaluing Szmodic in his opinion and feels we should be accepting the offer from Ipswich and he is really unhappy with the club then instead of playing well and putting himself at risk of injury then would he not be putting a transfer request in?
  15. Even if Szmodic is pissed off it isn't effecting his performances.If someone pays the fee or Rovers cave in then he will get his move, if he doesn't then he might sulk for a bit but it will serve no purpose to him playing poorly
  16. Good team.I wouldn't have started Brittain or Pickering with our lack of senior cover though
  17. The incident Vs Boro when Braintwaithe nearly took Fry's eye out and then Warnock's OTT reaction affected Braintwaithe,pre that game he looked a lot better after that he was poor but you could see he had something
  18. Sounds like they have loads of injuries.I think we are gonna give them a hiding, like we did to other lower league teams in the early rounds last year ,when a number of our younger players played Id be giving Duru a start at rb and Batty at left back .We shouldn't be risking Brittain and Pickering when we have no senior cover in the building, and Duru and Batty need looking at in a more competitive game
  19. After Peterborough have taken their cut and Szmodic loyalty bonus ,and in the fee to Pboro and wages paid to Szmodic we would be making minuscule profit for the championship top goalscorer last season and our most important player In this instance I don't see how Rovers are in the wrong...even tho if the fee really is only £9 million that we would accept then I still think that is too cheap .
  20. So I didn't see you moaning about the fee we got for Wharton?
  21. We don't have to sell him. If Ipswich want to buy him then they have to pay what we have asked for. It really is that simple
  22. If he signed a new contract on the basis he could join a premier league club for a specific fee then why wouldn't have not just been put in his contract? I'm honestly not buying this bullshit gentleman's agreement.It makes no sense for it not to be just put In his contract.
  23. If the bids only reach £8.5 million then we shouldn't sell him it's as simple as that . If Sammie does as you say and throws his toys out the pram then so what?He might miss a couple of games but he won't go on strike indefinitely and it will serve him no purpose to play poorly here . Also only palace were willing to bid for Wharton and pay £18.5 million I'm sure you described that as a poor fee received
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.