Nope, still just showing JDT all on his own.

Perhaps you need a militant wing 😁

I think the monies which were spent on the Neville house were sent to this company and that forms/formed part of the investigation into Venky Hatcheries. Could be wrong on that though.

I take it that Diego still passed our medical 😁

I doubt they have a clue either (Venkys - not our learned friends!)

I guess the Trust’s conundrum is in deciding when they believe this would be a better ‘tactic’ than maintaining a channel of communication with the club.

How about to put pressure on them to explain their short and long term intentions and their plans to achieve these? (I know I know 🤦‍♂️)

Warming up for the meeting eh

I’m not sure he’ll find much 😁😁

You should ask them if you can even if it’s just to get their refusal to agree into the minutes 🤔🤨

I meant the Venkys but the more who are there the merrier (or maybe not!)

If you mean the owners I think you’d want it to be all of them together. If it wasn’t, you’d probably get different answers depending on which of them it was.

I read yesterday that no team has ever scored 300 in the fourth innings in India (irrespective of the result).

There is a long list of documents which are required to be sent to the EFL before they’ll okay a transfer. They should (but clearly can’t!) be able to get these right every time.

You weren’t far wrong with your prediction.

I’m only going on what we were told his responsibilities would be when he took the job. I haven’t a clue how close to the reality that is which is why I put ‘I doubt’ (as against I know).

Why set up the deals in the first place though? I appreciate the ‘to show we tried’ argument but surely there’s easier ways of doing this than fudging the paperwork?

Aren’t sacrificial lambs usually lower in the food chain?

That’s far from what his job entails so I doubt he is under employed. Whether he is overpaid and/or no good at his job are entirely different ‘arguments’ to make.

Doesn’t this (from SW) suggest he/the board (and not GB) has the final say on recruitment? “There will be a defined player budget which quite a bit of it is committed to the players we’ve got but then there will be an amount set aside for how we want to use it. “Gregg has got the budget lines, he knows what’s available to spend and he will then propose an acquisition of a player, whether that be a permanent transfer, a loan or a free transfer, and he’ll present that to me and the board and say ‘this is who we want’.

Are we any closer to filling the following vacancy?? https://s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/gc-media-assets.gc.roversservices.co.uk/7f909320-7578-11ed-adfa-a911dc879109.pdf

I think Shaw was in charge when Silvester joined.

Silvester/Waggott are the people who can sign the paperwork. This doesn’t mean they’re the ones who actually do the paperwork.

Venkys London Limited have the power to remove the directors of Rovers. The Raos are the directors of Venkys London.