Someone else can find the video for that one 😄😄😄

🤔

Where was Grealish’s hand supposed to be…

Is it just me or was that more VAR incompetence?

Bad start for United…

I doubt we’d be fooled by a leap of 1,000 tickets when they weren’t even on sale.

Unless SW was taking credit for someone else’s (at Charlton) ideas and initiatives…

Is this man the real saviour of English football? - I think we all know the answer! (article from 2008): https://www.express.co.uk/expressyourself/34577/Is-this-man-the-real-saviour-of-English-football Please try to not piss yourself laughing and/or pull your hair out in a rage…

I think @only2garners would say if the minutes had been edited by the club and if this distorted what took place. The minutes do suggest the club gets an easier ride from the fans forum than they would from some members on here but without being in the room it’s impossible for us to know.

Average attendances in league: Wins - 13,907 Draws - 14,833 Losses - 16,400 First 18 matches - 2.22 points per match Final 5 matches - 0.6 points per match. Clearly very unscientific but looks like the pressure got to them - if so, hopefully they’ll be better for it next season (and in a position to take advantage of the ‘experience’)

It’s the intangible benefits of a bigger home support which makes SW’s obsession with revenue (over bums on seats) so infuriating.

I understand now 😀 (if often takes things being explained twice for this to happen!)

The more we discuss this the more complex it gets…

They won’t sell any more if they don’t put them back on sale…

Nope, we discussing the details of what makes them lying twonks…

I consider the price to be value for money because it’s a figure I’d be happy to pay. I don’t consider it a fair price as I know it’s a figure many can’t afford to pay.

100% agree

I don’t think we’d have been financially better off if we’d not been on Sky but what SW says suggests Venkys will be better off because we were on Sky. I think (but I’m by no means certain) the owners can’t put more in because of FFP. I don’t see why the extra income from Sky can’t be spent on transfer fees/wages or offset against lower ticket prices.

Buddy Holly - Peggy Sue

FFP rules are losses of £5 million a year or £13 million a year if owners inject equity to cover losses.

Found it 😀(in the new sporting director/DoF thread) My initial post wasn’t intended as a criticism, I was merely seeking clarification (which you’ve kindly provided)

Why did they give a caveated (still contactable) not renewed figure and not the actual not renewed figure?

Shouldn’t the minutes accurately reflect what was said in the meeting? ie. if K-Hod ‘went off on one’ the minutes should record this.

Thanks for quoting my stupidity before I managed to hide it 😁

I’d rather see him in the job centre queue…