We have Hedges and Markanday as left footed right wingers, it seems to be over-stocking to get a third of a similar ilk so I wouldn't sign him again. To describe him as "awful" is hyperbolic in the extreme though. Mixed bag in mainly cameos.

Plenty of free transfers available in January? And how is that absolving Mowbray of any blame? I don't need to come up with conspiracy stories in a game we ended up winning comfortably nor fabricating a host of available free transfers in January to know that the manager played a huge part and was ultimately responsible as manager for where we are set to finish in the table, hence me wanting him to go, equally he was responsible for getting us to 2nd in the first place. I was merely pointing out that giving the manager 700k knowing that 500k worth was knowingly injured well in advance of the deadline, as well as refusing the manager the autonomy to sell a player and use the funds to reinvest is not what I would consider to be backing a manager considering the position that we was in. My point was against Venkys, not in support of Mowbray.

Not as simple as saying the fault lies with "no one else." Amidst a promotion push and aside from the excused Markanday, he spent 200k and the other 2 were loans, maybe it would be reasonable to expect more even in those limited markets but you are always facing an uphill battle to do much with that.

I think the opposite, like with many departing players, I think people forget how poor a player is once he has not worn a Rovers shirt for a while. Another example of that would be Ruben Rochina. Bell was rubbish, he may well be in general doing better at Luton and it shows how poor a League it is quality wise that players like him and many others easily get contracts at this level. That being said, when I have seen Luton play this season he has not impressed, in the last game Nathan Jones was going crazy at him at one point. I also don't think he had many horror shows, I just thought that he was consistently below par, technically so par regularly slicing and mis-hitting the ball out, offered nothing going forward and not one to be in the trenches with, often allowing crosses to go in and not good when the chips were down. Pickering is an improvement and there are big question marks about him.

Exactly, they have always been the problem.

He was not a burden 3 years ago. And as ever, the responsibility falls with the owners to sack a manager.

Haha believe me, I realised long ago!

Its crazy how quickly some people believe any old rumour.

No chance.

If only our owners had a bit of ambition and invested some money.

Its very unlikely that a series of young players will all break through at once. Maybe Vale and Garrett for example are best off with loan spells in the 2 leagues below us, Brown the same. Carter we likely will need.

😂 I have "accepted" it. The total lack of clarity coming from Venkys even since he as good as announced it himself plus the general lack of clarity and transparency on top of the way the club has been run across 12 terrible years tells me NOT to expect a plan. There is no way that 6 targets have been identified pending imminent interviews. Do you think that Venkys even know that Mowbray is leaving? Surely after all of these years, you dont expect a reasonable plan surely? And if that was the case, surely they would have announced Mowbrays imminent exit already? Even if it was a case of Mowbray will leave upon the expiry of his contract, x will take over.

As others have touched on, what we need to do and what Venkys will do are 2 different things. And I wouldnt get too obsessive over tabloid hacks making stories up about 6 man shortlists when we havent even announced Mowbrays departure. Your comments about Dyche are very childish. He would never come but he would be an incredible appointment if we had any ambition. I presume that if Cornet, Tarkowski and Pope became available in the summer, you would be equally dismissive.

Indeed, should, but this is Venkys.

Considering that 4 mid-table finishes seem set to be the Championship track record of Mowbray, then yes, he could do much worse and actually take us down or even into a relegation scrap. Mowbray will rightfully be leaving, that much is clear, and if we delay that just out of fear of appointing another Coyle/Kean (an upgrade in your logic) then we are just kicking the can down the road and may aswell give up completely. But no matter how many times you try to deflect the continuous neglectful way in which our club has been run over 12 years in a league whereby teams across the board make regular losses on top of that onto one man as if he has wrecklessly been going on spending spree after spending spree, make no mistake, things can get worse, and Mowbray's time managing us at Championship level has actually been mediocre, not disastrous to the point that it would be hard to do any worse.

Chaddy, we haven't even announced the departure of Mowbray yet, this idea of a 6 man shortlist is beyond premature,

@RevidgeBlue you keep repeatedly saying that Mowbray has burnt through £100m of the owners money. 1. Why have you assumed in advance a loss of £36.5m in the 2022 accounts? 2. How can you possibly put down the general inefficient running of the club from the top down in a league whereby many teams make regular losses solely down to the manager, and compared to managers in a totally different financial landscape decades ago? He seems a bit miffed lately not that he hasnt been offered a new deal but that he hasnt been communicated to on the subject, a frustration shared by all previous managers under Venkys. Edit: Apologies for a poor quality screenshots. Losses in the accounts of 2021, 2020, 2019 and 2018 are £6.6m, £21.9m, £18.2m and £16.8m respectively.

He deserved to be sacked at the end of last season when we regressed to 15th but based on results, not this recent obsession about "actions or lack of them on the touchline."

The Lancashire Telegraph is clearly lacking when it comes to breaking stories, but what will there be to report regarding a new manager? The current one hasn't even been officially announced as leaving, its hardly as if a series of potential candidates will have been interviewed.

The betting odds are not a reliable barometer though, it is a small market to begin with so a handful of optimistic fans putting a bit of money on their preferred options will make a considerable difference.

I suspect that the next few weeks (and beyond, no doubt it will drag out) will be a hotbed of self-anointed ITK's with a million and one different names regarding a potential new manager, and a lot of premature excitement/anger on the back of it. We haven't even officially announced that Mowbray is going so I suspect it will be a decent wait.

Is our wage bill between the 6th and 8th highest in the league?

This 15m-20m "contribution" is not relevant to judging performance.

It would be counterproductive and unrealistic to expect the crowd to go into a game that has (albeit a tiny hope of) a chance riding on it being hostile. If it was hostile, then it would surely be against our idiot owners.

If it was a straight choice, Grayson or Mowbray, who would you pick out of interest? One word answer.