booth

Or as Chaddy calls him, the motherbrain. A few of us call Chaddy something similar, occasionally.

Yes, it would appear that Boro want rid but want someone in first. Mowbray will (and probably rightly) see it as too soon to strengthen and push for promotion, but he wasn't here through the Bowyer years when we always seemed to be within touching distance of the play offs but never quite got there. Sometimes you just have to go for it if the opportunities there but Mowbray doesn't seem to be that kind of guy. Apart from that one risky expensive signing of the player who shalt not be named, which seemed totally out of character for him. Who knows he may have another dabble if Venkys let him.

Haha, you got Chaddied ? It's a BRFCS rite of passage.

At least Peter Crouch is spoken for ?

Why not just split the posts and add them to the appropriate thread?

We'd be further up the table if he'd bagged a few ;)

I remember how disappointed I was when Andy Cole went over there. I suppose there's always that. If we did sign Austin we'd taint one of their heroes, especially if he scored plenty of goals.

To be fair I think Burnley are still paying their players in sheep.

It's like the Boro fans that were wondering why would Lambert allow goal machine Jordan Rhodes to leave. According to their fans, Pulis has been playing Assombalonga of position and seems to prefer Hugill.

Cos...

I think they put match highlights of the 16/17 season later in 2017. Probably to give people an incentive to sign up early. I think Big Dog has been crossing the streams.

I can imagine how that conversation ended. "Tell you what Waggs, buy me Assombalonga and we can talk about it."

Doesn't sound like your opinion when you write stuff like... Facts and opinions aren't the same

You do all know what it means when a journalist writes. "It is understood..." I could be rude, but it's journalistic language for. "I'm guessing."

Yes, where is this from?

Well, they are playing Utd next match.

Excellent win, we need to get a SIGN REED campaign going and extend Rodwell's contract.

I believe we're still signing Ben Brereton, and will be for about six transfer windows.

It would be but sadly fair use for audio/visual work was thrown out over a decade ago. http://alexcox.com/ed_12-04.htm

Is I have been stopped from posting this by moderators. Coyle a banned word Ha, his full name is censored. Can I still say Steve Kean? Edit: oh dear, an oversight.

It broke when Coyle got sacked.

In comparison to Brereton, Myles at least looked up for the one game I saw him play in. Brereton looks so uncomfortable. It reminds me of when Kevin Davies came here and completely lost his bottle, almost immediately.

You're welcome.

If I'm honest he uses far too much match footage so on the point of copyright I agree. We shouldn't stop fans filming in the ground. Many fans around the country film themselves reacting to the match, some fans just film the players warming up, or the crowd to capture the atmosphere - stuff that isn't really part of the broadcast. Then they'll edit it in with a post-match report. A banning on all mobile phone filming in the ground will stop all that and some of it might be good PR for the club. It's just common sense what is and what isn't breaking copyright. Someone shakily filming a penalty from the back seats of the top tier, while several spectators heads hove into view then hundreds of people jump up and down spoiling the shot isn't exactly rivaling Sky Sports. Okay, maybe Channel 5. And sorry to repeat myself but the club used to handle things like this so much better as they did before the Kean/Shaw era.