Disgusting!

Just as a point of order, could you screenshot these ads for alcohol and cigarettes? They shouldn’t be appearing as far as I’m aware. I’m taking a strong interest as a mod who gives an unhealthy amount of time to help this site run smoothly. I don’t think it’s right that you are dying on this particular hill of slagging off an exceptionally hard-working admin team (I couldn’t physically be arsed to do the work that J*B, Stubbs, and the other techies do) for keeping the site alive in the most cost-efficient (not cheapest), morally sound way possible. I also don’t understand why you think the site has ‘chosen’ to offer subscription for any nefarious purpose, as intimated by the context of your posts. The crux of the matter is: We need to run these ads to survive. If you don’t like them, this is the revenue they generate, so if you can pay for it instead of the ads, you won’t see them. If you can offer a better solution, offer it instead of being high and mighty.

Why are you being so nasty about this? The nature of the ads is not a decision our team can make, aside from restricting such ads if they are reported to the relevant admin. Without them being reported, we don’t know what ads you’re seeing, as they’re based on YOUR browsing. Insinuating the team has done this deliberately is really quite shitty of you.

So what would you suggest?

And yet you think they’ve not chosen well.

Have you considered doing something helpful and reaching out to the site with a better solution?

Without that revenue there wouldn’t BE any user experience because there’d be no BRFCS.

Black and grey version of that could look smart.

Christmas fixtures are much kinder to us fans this year at least.

But being one of the best midfielders of your generation, and winning a few trophies as a manager too, means you can criticise a player.

Plus a career in engineering…

I’d ban you so hard if J*B and K-Hod weren’t holding me back right now!

I don’t ‘go looking out’ for them either, but I have enough awareness of my surroundings when I’m out walking to know they’re there.

Eating those in bold are not actually ‘bad for you’ at all, as they can contribute to a balanced diet.

‘If I pretend they’re not there, they’re not there.’

Completely agree, and that’s the minimum compensation imo. The risk they were taking in their personal and professional lives adds to it.

You’re not ’more equal’, you know…

https://www.rovers.co.uk/news/2023/june/15/sondre-signs-/ Welcome Sondre!

Glenda Jackson, MP, double Oscar Winner, and Morecambe & Wise Show legend!

So there’s literally no reason for you to go to games. Just stay at home and subscribe to RoversTV, save yourself the travel.

Swag-cap on: We want a ‘smaller’ fixture for the opening day as it would bring more fans than usual by nature of being the opening game. Leeds will fill the away end whatever day it is, so hopefully that’s a midweek evening match that’s also on TV.

I meant the lower price that the original poster quoted, around £275-350. Anything higher than that prices people out, as a family goes from costing about £700 to well over £1000.

Nobody. It’d be covered by a modest increase in sales, as seen by local examples and our own historical examples. But you know that already.

I know a dozen off the top of my head, who could’ve afforded to attend at the lower price, but haven’t taken the plunge at the more expensive price.

As much as FFP demands of them because of their inefficiency/malaise re: generating income at the club.