Is there nothing in between those options?

Marc Almond - The Days Of Pearly Spencer

Spin Doctors - Two Princes

Sometimes Stokes tries to be too clever for his own good.

The Honeycombs - Have I The Right?

https://www.bcfc.com/news/all/matt-gardiner-players-integral-to-set-play-success

I knew Kidd but I don’t think I’d have remembered if he hadn’t been on @arbitro’s list.

That effect isn’t always a conscious one either.

+ Lambert??

At one point we were after a ‘Head of Methodology and Set-Pieces’… https://s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/gc-media-assets.gc.roversservices.co.uk/7f909320-7578-11ed-adfa-a911dc879109.pdf

You’re welcome 👍 I think your Gallagher example is included in that list but the headings aren’t overly clear. I interpreted them (rightly or wrongly!) as… Total shots on goal = shots whether on target or not Shots at the goal = shots on target

Sounds very plausible.

Stop stating your opinion as fact - it is very very annoying.

Seems ridiculously low.

Signed a new one in February ‘21. https://www.rovers.co.uk/news/2021/february/new-deal-for-dolan/

I would and I imagine Eustace will but your original post was so certain I’d assume you’d actually heard confirmation.

I don’t see the obviousness myself but hopefully he will do so (and be good at it!)

Perma-tan…

Thanks, I’d seen that but obviously it doesn’t mean he’ll definitely be taking over ours. Hopefully he is though!

Rouge cookies…

Where have you seen that?

Doesn’t need to be (as per my previous post).

Possibly caught by either the second half of (a) or by (c)?

I’ve had jobs where only a certain person could sign certain documents but other people (including me) could draft them. Initially these people would check my work before signing but after a while they’d just sign away without a second thought.

The following is from the owners’ and directors’ test - does anyone know whether we include Suhail on our declaration?