rigger

We will qualify, we will probably get to the final, but I would not want to pay £150 to watch it.

Yet you still renewed

I don't understand your reasoning. You say you won't renew next season unless the owners are gone. Yet you have renewed this season, with those owners ?

Especially if the two keepers where the ones we have!

Is it something to do with little metal robots laughing and taking the piss, (remember the TV advert) ?

Could a list of questions be prewritten and submitted, then a list of the questions not allowed, could be displayed on here ?

Or he actually was better than non-league.

I watched the whole of the Turkey/Georgia game. I couldn't be bothered watching the last twenty minutes of the England debacle.

I disagree, we will stay up with or without Szmodics, if we sort out the keeper situation.

Head ofs !

It is even worse if they can send funds. It means they don't want to send the funds. Or they haven't been asked to send the funds.

But the question is how much money is avaiable. If only a few hundred thousand is available, not a lot of strengthening will be possible. Yet the statement could still be made that" Money is available to strengthen the squad ".

It says money for strengthening the squad. It does not say ENOUGH avaiable money to ACTUALLY strengthen the squad.

Yes.

The Rovers have had a couple of those in the past

The last person to be picked in a schoolyard line-up, wouldn't do what Pears did against Sheffield wednesday.

Goalkeepers that are bad with their feet don't do what Pears did against Sheffield Wednesday.

you forgot the unreliable defence.

Most successful teams are based on a good keeper.

I hope so.

Do you get pears in a sack ?

If your best player in a certain position comes back after injury, then he should be selected, in my opinion .

The thing you are missing, is that Venky Rovers did the negotiations.

It would surprise me

Neither are good enough. Although Eastams distribution is very good.