RevidgeBlue

No doubt you'll be screaming for Ohashi to be booked.

7,600 looks about right tbf. The question is how that stacks up against other Saturday "real" attendances.

End of the day you usually get what you pay for and we paid £250k.

A point's not good enough with Oxford winning and given it would leave Portsmouth level on points with two games in hand.

That's going to look a bit pathetic when the Freedom of Information request comes back. That one will need to be widely publicised.

Absolutely. It's only a starting point or should be. Im a bit worried by the apparent lack of funding though.

Not watching today but that's my overall opinion of them. "Racist" Referees. ROFL.

We certainly seem to be in a Land of Confusion.

According to Sky the Watford keeper was complaining about being bundled off the ball for the goal, so maybe he is.

Ground described as "quarter full".

Agreed. From the pictures posted the "real" attendance looks about 6-7k at an absolute stretch. All I'll say is that if the Club anti/boycotters are reduced to crowing about attendances like that - we really are finished.

You may or may not but presumably you'd be competitive and I think certainly you'd get a tilt at the play offs from time to time.

Sorry that's absolute nonsense imo.

Why do they hate over 65's so much?

Personally I don't think anyone should feel in the least bit guilty either for going, or for adhering to the call for a boycott, or even for organising the boycott. Everyone has to do what they feel is right for them and I assume everyone wants the same thing ultimately which is a successful Club.

Plus criminal record meaning a potential loss of employment. Bit more than the trivial breach of the peace it might have been in the past. (Civil offence) And banning order of 3-5 years. Although some might argue the latter would be a bonus at the moment.

If someone came in presume Jorgensen would be classed as the other

He just makes it up as he goes along. Not sure why anyone takes anything he says literally.

As others have already pointed out - the "seasonal slump" started in August this season. Will we notice a difference?

Give it a rest for heaven's sake.

The call to arms last season was nothing whatsoever to do with the Club being so badly run we witnessed the man who got us into 7th walk out to join a Club in the relegation zone of course!

That's a real piece of propaganda on behalf of the Club. No context whatsoever. Calling for Pasha/Waggott/Gestede not to attend matches last season "despite the onfield performance". ROFL.

Yeah, in a week's time (if the presser is correct) we'll only have 5 of the "13" out so no excuses whatsoever. Well "officials" etc but not on injuries anyway.

Very good article on the whole - disagree on a few points though 1) Whilst I want Venky's out I wouldn't be happy with well meaning but skint local owners who took us down 2 divisions either 2) Suhail didn't arrive in 2024. He's been around forever and for example was (I was led to believe) solely involved with the hire of Lambert. 3) The Mowbray era was most definitively NOT a golden period - saw the stagnation and inertia whist the owners still retained the last vestiges of any interest that is a large cause of the problems we face today.

Well, does that not in itself indicate a problem behind the scenes or are you trying to suggest this season and the last couple of seasons are entirely par for the course everywhere? I would say playing Kargbo for two games when he had a muscle tear, Cantwell being out for over two months with what was initially described as a "kick on the knee" and Gudjohnssen being potentially ruled out for the season shortly after returning to training and being initially diagnosed as out for 2 weeks are all highly irregular.